Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #589891 > unrolled thread

Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?

Started bymapou001@gmail.com
First post2016-07-18 21:37 -0700
Last post2016-07-20 01:49 -0400
Articles 19 — 8 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 21:37 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-18 23:49 -0500
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:02 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical  composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical  composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:00 -0700
        Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical   composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-19 01:26 -0700
          Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical   composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 01:29 -0700
            Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 10:40 -0500
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-07-19 08:43 +0200
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 00:03 -0700
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-07-19 12:33 +0000
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? xxein1@att.net - 2016-07-19 08:14 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 09:04 -0700
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:32 -0500
        Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 10:41 -0700
          Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:49 -0500
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 13:12 -0500
      Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 11:19 -0700
    Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-20 01:49 -0400

#589891 — Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-18 21:37 -0700
SubjectTwo questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?
Message-ID<e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com>
Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?

If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#589893

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-18 23:49 -0500
Message-ID<nmkbhc$16j$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#589891
On 7/18/2016 11:37 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How
> does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other
> particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?

particles do not have digestion systems, therefore cannot... "shit"
Particles do not have pockets to keep "rat's ass" in to give away as awards.

>
> If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist
> crap.

do your thoughts "exist" ?
or are they just random firings of unrelated nerve endings ?

>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...


so Dr Spangoli, Dentist, has you in his chair and you make ah sound, 
cute. means nothing here, dirtbag.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589900

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-18 22:02 -0700
Message-ID<a98bcd7f-6cab-4cc0-a2dc-3ffc20cdfb6d@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#589893
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:49:51 PM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> On 7/18/2016 11:37 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How
> > does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other
> > particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
> 
> particles do not have digestion systems, therefore cannot... "shit"
> Particles do not have pockets to keep "rat's ass" in to give away as awards.
> 
> >
> > If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist
> > crap.
> 
> do your thoughts "exist" ?
> or are they just random firings of unrelated nerve endings ?
> 
> >
> > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> 
> 
> so Dr Spangoli, Dentist, has you in his chair and you make ah sound, 
> cute. means nothing here, dirtbag.

Haysoos Martinez! Sergio's throwing a fit! It's more than he can bear.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589897 — Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
SubjectRe: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?
Message-ID<578DB36C.7381@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#589891
mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?


a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or
set in motion.

a particle is...aware.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589899 — Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-18 22:00 -0700
SubjectRe: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?
Message-ID<800b4040-588c-48d0-a88f-9f452752aa2f@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#589897
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:57:49 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
> 
> 
> a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or
> set in motion.
> 
> a particle is...aware.

I like that. It's no better than the usual Einstein crap.

ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589909 — Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?

FromThe Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Date2016-07-19 01:26 -0700
SubjectRe: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?
Message-ID<578DE44D.11B6@ix.netcom.com>
In reply to#589899
mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:57:49 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
> >
> >
> > a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or
> > set in motion.
> >
> > a particle is...aware.
> 
> I like that. It's no better than the usual Einstein crap.
> 
> ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...


to me
you're just a
chemical scum 
on the surface of
the earth.

You like that?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589910 — Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-19 01:29 -0700
SubjectRe: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit?
Message-ID<a600cd24-42aa-41be-ba1f-4c46e4d700f1@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#589909
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 1:26:20 AM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:57:49 PM UTC-7, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Why should a particle give a about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
> > >
> > >
> > > a particle receives it's instructions Before it is placed in position or
> > > set in motion.
> > >
> > > a particle is...aware.
> > 
> > I like that. It's no better than the usual Einstein crap.
> > 
> > ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> 
> 
> to me
> you're just a
> chemical scum 
> on the surface of
> the earth.
> 
> You like that?

Certainly. I'm getting to you. Soon, you'll be foaming at the mouth and jumping up and down. I'm gonna like that, too.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589933

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-19 10:40 -0500
Message-ID<nmlhkm$1qlh$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#589910
On 7/19/2016 3:29 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 1:26:20 AM UTC-7, T
>





> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>

......open wide for dentist yawning again...   go get some coffee.....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589906

FromHelmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat>
Date2016-07-19 08:43 +0200
Message-ID<dvirob9j7e1conoglgq136olds4guqhssf@4ax.com>
In reply to#589891
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote:

>Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
>
>If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.
>
>ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

All particles in the universe know you are an idiot.

w.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589907

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-19 00:03 -0700
Message-ID<52fbfc2b-240a-4c41-94bd-ab758097d6ce@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#589906
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 11:43:18 PM UTC-7, Helmut Wabnig wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> >Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
> >
> >If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.
> >
> >ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> 
> All particles in the universe know you are an idiot.
> 
> w.

LOL. The truth hurts, I know. The world according to brain-dead relativists:

 "Everything is relative"

thus condemning us to live in a self-referential universe. How stupid is that? What a pathetic bunch of cretins. You assholes need to repent from your lies. Sackcloths and ashes for you! Otherwise, fuck all of you.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589925

Fromjmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com>
Date2016-07-19 12:33 +0000
Message-ID<PM000537FC44CDAC81@aca41cbd.ipt.aol.com>
In reply to#589906
Helmut Wabnig wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
>
>>Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a
particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs
so as to give a rat's ass?
>>
>>If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.
>>
>>ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
> All particles in the universe know you are an idiot.

Probably not his brane particle.

/BAH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589931

Fromxxein1@att.net
Date2016-07-19 08:14 -0700
Message-ID<fbe49622-87c4-40ce-8ced-5e7b63cfa2d8@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#589891
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 12:37:24 AM UTC-4, mapo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
> 
> If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.
> 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

xxein:  So you don't care what time it is, where you are or how fast you are going?  I guess that's typical for a pile of crap.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589935

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-19 09:04 -0700
Message-ID<4bff9797-2460-45c0-a974-950f97fbe950@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#589891
On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:37:24 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote:
> Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
> 
> If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.
> 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

I'm still waiting for a mental midget in the relativist camp to explain how nature uses frames of reference. Or is an FOR something that Einstein pulled right out of his fucking ass? You know, just like all the other crap that he pulled out of his ass, crap like spacetime, spacetime curvature, geodesics, time dilation, time travel, gravitational waves, etc.

Do you fucking morons even realize that Einstein's spacetime is a fucking block universe in which nothing fucking happens?

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589951

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-19 12:32 -0500
Message-ID<nmlo7j$5aa$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#589935
On 7/19/2016 11:04 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:37:24 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote:
>

>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>

> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
 > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

yep, you moron.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589953

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-19 10:41 -0700
Message-ID<436121da-70e8-49c2-9b4a-6f1d7fbe4be6@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#589951
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 10:32:40 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
> On 7/19/2016 11:04 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:37:24 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> 
> >>
> >> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> >
> 
> > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> >
>  > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
>  
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
>  
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
>  
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
>  
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... 
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> 
> yep, you moron.

LOL. I knew you liked the laugh, Sergio. I just didn't realize that it had such a powerful effect on you. Hmm. Very interesting.

ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589957

FromSergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Date2016-07-19 12:49 -0500
Message-ID<nmlp6m$6lb$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#589953
On 7/19/2016 12:41 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 10:32:40 AM UTC-7, Sergio wrote:
>> On 7/19/2016 11:04 AM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Monday, July 18, 2016 at 9:37:24 PM UTC-7, mapo...@gmail.com
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>>
>>
>>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>>
>>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>  ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>  ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>  ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>  ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>  ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>  ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>>
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>  ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>>
>> yep, you moron.
>
> LOL. I knew you liked the laugh, Sergio. I just didn't realize that
> it had such a powerful effect on you. Hmm. Very interesting.
>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

yep, you moron. > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

yep, you moron. > ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>
ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

yep, you moron.
yep, you moron.
>

      the power of c+p, as Wormley knows, it distorts the Universe

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589965

FromOdd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Date2016-07-19 13:12 -0500
Message-ID<nmlqht$8ad$6@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#589891
On 7/18/2016 11:37 PM, mapou001@gmail.com wrote:
> Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle
> know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?

It doesn't know. Nor does it need to.
There are some properties that are obviously RELATIONS between the 
particle and the reference frame. Velocity, for example, is not 
INTRINSIC to the particle -- something that Galileo noticed in the 
1600's. Note that the 1600s were a few years before Einstein's birth.

>
> If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.
>
> ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#589968

Frommapou001@gmail.com
Date2016-07-19 11:19 -0700
Message-ID<f9532367-a695-412d-b5ff-2a1986bedef5@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#589965
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016 at 11:12:17 AM UTC-7, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>[crap] 
> -- 
> Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Fuck you. You're just a stupid ass kisser, a mental midget. But then again, all relativists are ass kissers and mental midgets.

ahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#590062

FromWally W. <ww84wa@aim.com>
Date2016-07-20 01:49 -0400
Message-ID<134uobp5cm9hut47ag5sd2qlfadr5l497i@4ax.com>
In reply to#589891
On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote:

>Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flatland
"You see," said my Teacher, "how little your words have done. So far
as the Monarch understands them at all, he accepts them as his own –
for he cannot conceive of any other except himself – and plumes
himself upon the variety of Its Thought as an instance of creative
Power. Let us leave this God of Pointland to the ignorant fruition of
his omnipresence and omniscience: nothing that you or I can do can
rescue him from his self-satisfaction."


>How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass?
>
>If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap.
>
>ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha...

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web