Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #540538 > unrolled thread

Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:47 -0800
    Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800

#540538 — Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe

Am 12.12.2015 16:16, schrieb Sam Wormley:
>
>> The CMB is well explained as radiation left over from an early stage
>> in the development of the universe, and its discovery is considered a
>> landmark test of the Big Bang model of the universe. When the
>> universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was
>> denser, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from a white-hot
>> fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and
>> the radiation filling it grew cooler. When the universe cooled
>> enough, protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms. These
>> atoms could no longer absorb the thermal radiation, and so the
>> universe became transparent instead of being an opaque fog.


Let's assume the 'big-bang' would have been a light-bulb, switched off 
13.8 billion years ago.

The remaining light cooled down to micro-waves and that is now received 
from all direction, since the universe expanded.

And this is actually, what they teach in schools and universities.



TH

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#540685

travellin taketh time;
but iff you can travel in a single,
canonical scalar interval,
try one of those hoverthings

> And this is actually, what they teach in schools and universities.
> 
> 
> 
> TH

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#540898

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 12.12.2015 16:16, schrieb Sam Wormley:
> >
> >> The CMB is well explained as radiation left over from an early stage
> >> in the development of the universe, and its discovery is considered a
> >> landmark test of the Big Bang model of the universe. When the
> >> universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was
> >> denser, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from a white-hot
> >> fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and
> >> the radiation filling it grew cooler. When the universe cooled
> >> enough, protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms. These
> >> atoms could no longer absorb the thermal radiation, and so the
> >> universe became transparent instead of being an opaque fog.
> 
> Let's assume the 'big-bang' would have been a light-bulb, switched off
> 13.8 billion years ago.
> 
> The remaining light cooled down to micro-waves and that is now received
> from all direction, since the universe expanded.
> 
> And this is actually, what they teach in schools and universities.
> 
> TH


space is a refridgerator...it cools down the hot suff.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web