Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe
Date	2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
Message-ID	<ddpeg3FfkplU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(20 earlier) <5669D295.6F7B@ix.netcom.com> <566B4633.916@ix.netcom.com> <K6ydnaOGP5lBNfbLnZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <dd1uljFhjpkU1@mid.individual.net> <P9ydnXHhHdbDp_HLnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 12.12.2015 16:16, schrieb Sam Wormley:
>
>> The CMB is well explained as radiation left over from an early stage
>> in the development of the universe, and its discovery is considered a
>> landmark test of the Big Bang model of the universe. When the
>> universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was
>> denser, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from a white-hot
>> fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and
>> the radiation filling it grew cooler. When the universe cooled
>> enough, protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms. These
>> atoms could no longer absorb the thermal radiation, and so the
>> universe became transparent instead of being an opaque fog.


Let's assume the 'big-bang' would have been a light-bulb, switched off 
13.8 billion years ago.

The remaining light cooled down to micro-waves and that is now received 
from all direction, since the universe expanded.

And this is actually, what they teach in schools and universities.



TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:47 -0800
  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800

csiph-web