Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #540898

Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 12.12.2015 16:16, schrieb Sam Wormley:
> >
> >> The CMB is well explained as radiation left over from an early stage
> >> in the development of the universe, and its discovery is considered a
> >> landmark test of the Big Bang model of the universe. When the
> >> universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was
> >> denser, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from a white-hot
> >> fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and
> >> the radiation filling it grew cooler. When the universe cooled
> >> enough, protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms. These
> >> atoms could no longer absorb the thermal radiation, and so the
> >> universe became transparent instead of being an opaque fog.
> 
> Let's assume the 'big-bang' would have been a light-bulb, switched off
> 13.8 billion years ago.
> 
> The remaining light cooled down to micro-waves and that is now received
> from all direction, since the universe expanded.
> 
> And this is actually, what they teach in schools and universities.
> 
> TH


space is a refridgerator...it cools down the hot suff.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:47 -0800
  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800

csiph-web