Re: Candy issue requires physics :-)

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Candy issue requires physics :-)
Date	Mon, 11 Jul 2016 03:03:59 -0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	21
Sender	Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID	<vteb5d-i98.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<1qhsih50b9xeb.1hbma9faw8mwj.dlg@40tude.net>
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="13361"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX195crhCvVWeDS1UmvFZ494i"
User-Agent	tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock	sha1:rvOMQTr0yFZsIAbQGIEW3Hy5KBo=
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:588695

Show key headers only | View raw

ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@fakeaddress.com> wrote:
> I bought a couple of pounds of large good quality
> candy last year in an airtight glass container. Then a
> bit later I needed the glass container for something
> else so placed the candies inside another non-airtight
> container. A couple of weeks later I realized they had
> begun to absorb moisture from air and had started to
> become sticky (almost). So to keep them separate I
> wrapped them individually with aluminum foil. Then
> last week at last I got a chance to go to them and
> have a few with hot tea, etc. I found that the
> aluminum foil are badly stuck with the candies and I
> have to remove them piece by piece in tiny sizes,
> requiring 100 to 15 minutes of work for each. Do you
> know how I could expedite the removal of the foils?

Warm water.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-10 19:37 -0500
  Candy issue requires physics :-) john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-07-10 17:42 -0700
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 20:40 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-10 22:26 -0500
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:28 -0500
        Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-13 10:11 -0500
          Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-16 15:17 -0500
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:13 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-10 22:36 -0400
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Mike Duffy <mqduffy001@bell.net> - 2016-07-10 23:22 -0400
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:40 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-07-11 03:03 +0000
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:45 -0500
      Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-13 20:46 -0700
        Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-14 09:06 -0500
          Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 08:03 -0700
  Re: Use the edge of a spoon to scrape off the foil. ClutterFreak <ClutterFreak@FakeAddress.com> - 2016-07-12 15:42 -0500
  Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "Colonel Edmund J. Burke" <burkesgurlz@t-girls.com> - 2016-07-14 07:59 -0700
    Re: Candy issue requires physics :-) "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-14 08:24 -0700

csiph-web