Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #573212
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Arguing with lunatics |
| Date | Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:10:49 -0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 37 |
| Sender | Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com> |
| Message-ID | <pnd2vc-e3c.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <nfbb45$325$1@gioia.aioe.org> <hoonuc-pd6.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <8_mdnU_s2_NP2ITKnZ2dnUU7-TXNnZ2d@giganews.com> <votnuc-h07.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <r_6dndLAl8Pp-4fKnZ2dnUU7-LPNnZ2d@giganews.com> <tofquc-phf.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <11495cf3-2dc1-4a7f-b93d-569ec8b8bfb3@googlegroups.com> <77mquc-m4g.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <7IKdnajACJSAwIPKnZ2dnUU7-THNnZ2d@giganews.com> <8k42vc-h7b.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <S-KdndWiA-b74IPKnZ2dnUU7-cfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="20042"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ZyEwZHRfhxaJfs4iAqUbi" |
| User-Agent | tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:gT4dTSRCzkO38H6rt6HjYWo9HjI= |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:573212 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: > > <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message > news:8k42vc-h7b.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >> Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote: >>> >>> <jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message >>> news:77mquc-m4g.ln1@mail.specsol.com... >>>> john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Who here thinks a jet plane >>>>> full of fuel can, all by itself, >>>>> bring down a building like >>>>> WTC1, and who thinks falling >>>>> debris and "scattered fires" >>>>> can bring down a building like WTC7? >>>>> (How did the fires start?) >>>> >>>> From the airplane crash, idiot. >>> >>> But what type of airplane does not have shadows and consisted of 3 >>> different >>> images? >> >> The kind in your delusions. > > You are a complete idiot because you didn't even check to see that the bogus > 9/11 attack involved the use of 3 different CGIs as proven by the 3 > different images from what should have been the exact same jet. While you are a totally delusional kook. Did you ever figure out the explosive energy difference between a "MRR nuke" and any other kind of nuclear explosive? -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-21 14:53 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 20:11 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-21 16:27 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-21 21:37 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-22 12:58 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 20:56 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 14:45 -0700
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-22 22:46 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 13:07 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 18:35 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:25 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 20:34 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:57 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:12 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-28 14:03 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-28 19:50 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-05-01 12:57 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-05-01 19:39 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2016-04-25 18:04 -0400
Re: Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 17:23 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 16:50 -0700
Re: Arguing with lunatics moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-25 22:41 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-25 21:10 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-26 13:13 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-04-26 19:06 +0000
Re: Arguing with lunatics ClutterFreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2016-04-22 18:08 -0700
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 15:29 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics ClutterFreak <clutterfreakincarnate@gmail.com> - 2016-04-25 14:08 -0700
Re: Arguing with lunatics "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-04-25 14:53 -0700
Re: Arguing with lunatics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 08:33 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 06:41 -0700
Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-23 12:58 -0400
Re: Arguing with lunatics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-23 12:33 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-04-23 10:56 -0700
Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-23 23:29 -0400
Re: Arguing with lunatics Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-23 22:42 -0500
Re: Arguing with lunatics benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-04-24 00:36 -0400
Re: Arguing with lunatics "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2016-04-25 13:10 -0500
csiph-web