Re: Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O

From	Sergio <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O
Date	2018-07-16 19:49 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<pijefo$1ncl$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<23957cb5-0e40-4377-b6be-064ce205b27c@googlegroups.com> <aaf312a9-8d8f-46b6-b211-5cd4368e63e5@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/16/2018 2:25 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 12:08:43 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> 
>> I think it's the gaseous H2O in the flame that is causing the difference and that mostly has to do with the fact that gaseous H2O is highly polar while vaporous H2O is not.
> 
> That is because you don't think. If you weren't such a complete dumbfuck, Jim, you would know by now that the gaseous form of H2O is *exactly* the same thing as vaporous H2O... but unfortunately you *are* a complete dumbfuck and therefore you don't know any better and are incapable of learning much of anything.
> 

James McGinn (McFly) is both gaseous and vapidness at the same time,
like a fart in a small closet.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:08 -0700
  Re: Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-07-16 12:25 -0700
    Re: Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:34 -0700
    Re: Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-16 19:49 -0500

csiph-web