Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #694156 > unrolled thread

Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:08 -0700
    Re: Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O pnalsing@gmail.com - 2018-07-16 12:25 -0700
      Re: Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2018-07-16 12:34 -0700
      Re: Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-07-16 19:49 -0500

#694156 — Zeeman Effect and gaseous or vaporous H2O

https://youtu.be/JV4Fk3VNZqs



Excellent demonstration.  And I really appreciate the level-headed reasoning that follows.

I think it's the gaseous H2O in the flame that is causing the difference and that mostly has to do with the fact that gaseous H2O is highly polar while vaporous H2O is not.

Surrounding the flame there is H2O in the atmosphere but it is not gaseous, it is liquid nanodroplets that are so small they appear to be gaseous.  (This appearance fools a lot of people, including whole paradigms, like meteorology.)  And here is the thing.  Gaseous H2O is dramatically more diamagnetic than is vaporous H2O.  This has to do with 1) the fact that vaporous H2O maintains hydrogen bonds between the various H2O molecules and gaseous H2O does not and 2) hydrogen bonds neutralize H2O polarity. 

There are potentially two sources of polarity activated gaseous H2O in the flame.  Firstly there is the H2O that is a result of combustion and, secondly, there may also be gaseous H2O that is a result of vaporous H2O infiltrating the flame from outside and becoming gaseous due to the heat.

For more details on why and how the polarity of H2O is variable and not a constant (which has long been mistakenly assumed by science) watch and study this:
Pauling's Omission
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iIQSubWJeNg&t=1761s

James McGinn / Solving Tornadoes

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#694158

On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 12:08:43 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:

> I think it's the gaseous H2O in the flame that is causing the difference and that mostly has to do with the fact that gaseous H2O is highly polar while vaporous H2O is not.

That is because you don't think. If you weren't such a complete dumbfuck, Jim, you would know by now that the gaseous form of H2O is *exactly* the same thing as vaporous H2O... but unfortunately you *are* a complete dumbfuck and therefore you don't know any better and are incapable of learning much of anything.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694160

On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 12:25:59 PM UTC-7, pnal...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 12:08:43 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> 
> > I think it's the gaseous H2O in the flame that is causing the difference and that mostly has to do with the fact that gaseous H2O is highly polar while vaporous H2O is not.
> 
> That is because you don't think. If you weren't such a complete dumbfuck, Jim, you would know by now that the gaseous form of H2O is *exactly* the same thing as vaporous H2O... but unfortunately you *are* a complete dumbfuck and therefore you don't know any better and are incapable of learning much of anything.

You got nothing!!!!   As always.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#694202

On 7/16/2018 2:25 PM, pnalsing@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, July 16, 2018 at 12:08:43 PM UTC-7, James McGinn wrote:
> 
>> I think it's the gaseous H2O in the flame that is causing the difference and that mostly has to do with the fact that gaseous H2O is highly polar while vaporous H2O is not.
> 
> That is because you don't think. If you weren't such a complete dumbfuck, Jim, you would know by now that the gaseous form of H2O is *exactly* the same thing as vaporous H2O... but unfortunately you *are* a complete dumbfuck and therefore you don't know any better and are incapable of learning much of anything.
> 

James McGinn (McFly) is both gaseous and vapidness at the same time,
like a fart in a small closet.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web