Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #564189

Re: Fazer maths for fakey

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:36:38 -0400, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler  
Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

> Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>
>
> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
> <news:cv5veb10d8mtp9tc8odj60icgkvepf8sca@4ax.com> did thusly jump head
> first into the wood chipper again:
>
>> FNVWe stomped a retard's brain flat. Again:
>
>>> Bite My Shiny Metal Ass (aka Shiny Tinfoil Spankard), in
>
>>>> Ding ding ding!
>>>>
>>>> No complex numbers, no euler's theorem, no fooly'all transformers.
>
> He says, using Euler's Formula and not knowing it. LOL

the one i've been using for three months?  LOL

>
> Yeah, folks, he's Shiny Tinfoil Brain, Usenet's Mathematical Moron.
> LOL
>
>>>> No look-at-me technobabble.  Just the facts, maam.
>>>>
>>>> Computing Vbc and Vca is left as an exercise for the reader.
>
>>> Bwahahaaa! Look at how hard I've got Shiny Tinfoil Spankard raping
>>> Google to prove himself not-a-Mathematical-Moron, after he's proven
>>> himself to *be* a Mathematical Moron _twice_ in the past few days.
>>>
>>> So you copy-n-pasted from ece.k-state.edu/~starret/581/3phase.html.
>
>> Nope, but undoubtedly the very same problem has been done
>> the very same way for hundred years.  So i'm happy an
>> undergrad also did it right.
>>
>> But you never could have, fakey, because you still don't
>> know how to do phasor arithmetic. LOL.
>
> Except I did, Moron. I've been correctly graphing it all along,
> starting with the 170 volt peak L-N, deriving the 120 volt RMS L-N
> from that, and deriving the 208 volt RMS L-L from that. I note you've
> thus far failed to produce even one graph, Mathematical Moron. LOL
>
>>> Here's the equivalent scientific notation formula. You'll note it
>>> produces the correct 208.207 volt RMS L-L from the 170 volt peak L-N.
>>> You'll also note it's what I've been graphing all along, you halfwit:
>
>> What you've been graphing all along... Lol.  You have been
>> graphing wrong sinewaves for weeks now.  The fact that you
>> finally got one graph right is pretty much expected, being a
>> broken clock is right twice a day etc...
>
> Except I've been graphing it correctly, Moron. DildoRider's the one
> who's been getting *double* voltage as a result of all three phases
> (akin to shorting all three phases together), getting an RMS voltage
> of a higher amplitude than the peak voltage from which the RMS voltage
> is derived, demonstrating he can turn 0 volts into either a negative
> or positive voltage, and k'laming that he was feeding 240 volts to the
> *primary* of a substation transformer, deriving 120 volts from the
> *primary*, then k'laming he was feeding that 240 volts to a 120/208
> volt three-phase electrical feed. He even did his kooky math to show
> how he was getting 208 volts from 240 volts.
>
>> Did you solve for 'd' yet, snickerturd?  ROFL... you are
>> never going to live that one down, ignoramus.
>
> You moron, d/dx [sin(x)] = cos(x).
>
> Congratulations, Mathematical Moron, all you've succeeded in doing is
> shifting the sinusoid along the x axis by 90 degrees.
>
> And you did it all while you're backpedaling away from having defended
> DildoRider's kooky sinewave subtraction equation for a month, because
> you're the moron who *still* can't grasp constructive and destructive
> interference.
>
> So your blather is just your attempt at diverting attention away from
> your being a Mathematical Moron.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> Here, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard... how about you take another crack at
> refuting^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H backpedaling from that giant whomping
> drop-kick you just received, which you screamed "KOOK!", snipped like
> a coward and ran away from.
>
> If Gerald Newton is such a "kook", Shiny Tinfoil Spankard, why is he
> smarter than you? You can't even figure out vector summation, because
> you're Usenet's Mathematical Moron who claims formulas are not math.
>
> <snicker>
>
> ===============================================================
> Bwahahahaaa! The Mathematical Moron sticks up for the Mathematical
> Mega-Moron. And that makes them both *wrong*.
>
> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa4htm.html>
> <http://www.electrician2.com/electa1/electa3htm.htm>
> =====================================================
> Mathematically, we can precisely *add* the three vectors for the line
> currents by converting vectors into their horizontal and vertical
> components by using trigonometry.  We can *add* the horizontal
> components, then *add* the vertical components, then convert this to
> polar coordinates to find the *sum* of the vectors. This is called
> algebraic *vector* *addition*.
> =====================================================
>
> And that all goes back to you moron's inability to grok the
> Superposition Principle, and thus the Additivity and Homogeneity
> properties of same... mostly you... you k'lamed that superposition and
> wave constructive/destructive interference were different things, and
> that constructive/destructive interference worked differently for
> standing waves and traveling waves... so you're especially moronic on
> this topic...
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle>
> "Note that when vectors or vector fields are involved, a superposition
> is interpreted as a vector sum."
>
> There's not a minus sign in an equation on that entire page. Morons.
>
> Here, you fecking *morons*... let me demonstrate it a way you halfwits
> will hopefully understand...
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/cuw4gus.png>
>
> Red: 100 volt, 0 degree phase
> Green: 100 volt, 120 degree phase
> Blue: Red + Green
>
> See where the Red and Green lines cross? What's that voltage? Oh, it's
> 50 volts. What's 50 + 50, you fucking *morons*? Oh, so when you sum
> two like sinewaves, you shift the resultant to exactly between the two
> tributaries, with the same amplitude as the tributaries.
>
> Hence the resultant is 180 degrees phase from the remaining third
> phase, hence the sum of the three phases of 3-phase AC must always
> equal zero.
>
> Now, let's look at what you morons are doing...
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/zdNCScp.png>
>
> Same exact graph, but the third phase has been added in Orange to show
> the Blue Line is 180 degrees phase from that Orange line, and a Purple
> line has been added to reflect DildoRider's moronic sinewave
> subtraction equation... now remember, we're figuring out the
> superposition (the constructive and destructive interference) of the
> Red and the Green lines.
>
> In that image, at the X axis where the Purple line peaks, the Red line
> has an amplitude of 87 volts. The green line has an amplitude of -87
> volts.
>
> Now, you *fucking* *morons*... what is the wave interference result
> when two waves interfere that have exactly opposite amplitudes? Oh...
> that's right, its ZERO. Which is also why the Blue line is at ZERO at
> that point on the X axis.
>
> Where's that 173.205 volts coming from in DildoRider's kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation, you *fucking* *morons*?
>
> But wait! It gets even better!
>
> <http://i.imgur.com/0l0SQjy.png>
>
> That's the same exact graph, but with DildoRider's kooky sinewave
> subtraction equation as purple and black lines... the purple line has
> the 0 degree phase as the first part of the equation, the black line
> has the 120 degree phase as the first part of the equation.
>
> And one can see that the result is flipped. According to DildoRider's
> kooky sinewave subtraction equation, he can convert 87 volts directly
> into either 173 *or* -173 volts!
>
> Because you're both Mathematical Morons.
>
> SPNAK!
>
> <dances a jig on the brains of the morons because I've irrefutably
> proven myself right, and proven the two *morons* are indeed huge
> fucking *Mathematical* *Morons*>
>
> Why are you *so* *stupid*, Shiny Tinfoil Spankard? LOL
>
> And the above proves DildoRider *and* Shiny Tinfoil Spankard have been
> *wrong* about every fucking thing they've been blathering.
>
> Bwahahaaaaa! Once again your Usenet Lord and Master drop-kicks your
> moronic asses across Usenet.
>
> I'ma just add another SPNAK! here...
>
> SPNAK!
>
> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>
> <snicker>
>
> And just so you SPNAK!ards can't bleat that I didn't show the
> formulas used:
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> 100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(240\cdot
> \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)+100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> \left(\left(100\left(\sin \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot
> 60+\left(120\cdot \frac{\pi }{180}\right)\right)\right)-100\left(\sin
> \left(2\cdot x\cdot \pi \cdot 60+\left(0\cdot \frac{\pi
> }{180}\right)\right)\right)\right)\right)
>
> And I'll just drop another SPNAK! in here for added effect...
>
> SPNAK!
>
> You may begin backpedaling in 3... 2... 1... GO!
>
> <snicker>
> ===============================================================
>
> You morons are never going to live down that giant fuckup... you
> bleated for *months* about it, only to be proven *wrong*. LOL
>
> SPNAK!
>
> I bet you wish you could be right just once, huh, Moron.
>
> <snicker>
>
> RUN! SHINY TINFOIL SPANKARD! RUUUUNNNNN!!!!
>
> Bwahahahahaaaa!
>


-- 
"sines, sines, everywhere there's sines
blocking up the snickerTurds, breaking his mind"
http://imgur.com/a/yMFsu

-

FNVWe attempts to rewrite physics texts in Message-ID:  
<3dcad3dd0a0d39727506717506883c26@dizum.com>

">>let's not forget that mine also had the correct applied mathematics
>> equations unlike fakey the supposed know-it-all:
>>  phase A: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x)
>> phase B: 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi)
>>  voltage difference between phase A and phase B at any point x in time:
>> 120*sin(2*pi*60*x) - 120*sin(2*pi*60*x+pi) = 240*sin(2*pi*60*x)

Wrong, as has already been proven. What does it say below, you fecking  
*moron*?

"The _sum_ E(θ) ≡ E(a) + E(b) can be written thusly:""

it says that you don't even know how to correctly apply mathematics to  
real-world AC electricity, snickerTurds.  it says that you're in denial  
about the inversion of your AC legs.

http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/alternating-current/chpt-10/single-phase-power-systems/
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/02170.png
"To mathematically calculate voltage between “hot” wires, we must subtract  
voltages, because their polarity marks show them to be opposed to each  
other:"
http://sub.allaboutcircuits.com/images/12112.png

http://www.samlexamerica.com/support/documents/WhitePaper-120240VACSingleSplitPhaseandMultiWireBranchCircuits.pdf

on page 2:

** NOTE: The phase of Hot Leg 2 (Phase B) is in the
  opposite direction - i.e., 180° apart from the phase
  of Hot Leg L1 (Phase A)

*COUGH*
SPNAK!!

-

i know a guy on the internet who will draw a triangular sine wave in ASCII  
art if you ask nicely.</GROUCHO MARX>
see: Message-ID: <4ba4a50aaaebc7fb8a348293c5cf9f13@dizum.com>

-

snickerTurds can't seem to refute the following:

- begin snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --
/*
HOW TO RUN: download arbitrary precision libraries from:

http://www.hvks.com/Numerical/arbitrary_precision.html

place those files in a directory and save this file as  
snickerSinewaveStew.cpp inside that same directory.

compiles with:

gcc -Wall -I. precisioncore.cpp snickerSinewaveStew.cpp -lstdc++

run with:

./a.out

enjoy the LULZ ;)

*/
#include <fprecision.h>
#include <iostream.h>

using namespace std;

int main(){

   //float_precision MIN=float_precision(0);
   //float_precision MAX=float_precision(0);

   float_precision STEP=float_precision(.0001);
   float_precision t=float_precision(0);    // time variable
   float_precision sum=float_precision(0);  // sum of SnickerTurd's  
ridiculous sinewave mess
   float_precision snickerPrediction=float_precision(2550.25);  //  
snickerTurd's erroneous k0oK-k'lame Sum
   float_precision PI;
   PI =_float_table(_PI,25);

   // this while loop will run forever, but snickers doesn't understand why
   while(sum < snickerPrediction){

     // fakey's Sinewave Stew(TM) see: MID:  
<db672705e57e4932eba3632562e0a941@dizum.com>
     sum = (float_precision(150) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(120)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(20.25) * float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(33)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(1400)* float_precision(  
sin(float_precision(150)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +(float_precision(20)*  
float_precision(sin(float_precision(5013)*float_precision(2)*PI*t))) +  
(float_precision(600)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(13)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)))  
+  
(float_precision(360)*float_precision(sin(float_precision(1209)*float_precision(2)*PI*t)));

     // perhaps show a few values larger than +2300 to educate teh  
snickerTurds
     if(sum>float_precision(2300)){
       cout << "t=" << t << " sum=" << sum << std::endl;
     }
     t = t+STEP;
   }
/*

Message-ID: <c8523e6d9c31e3282bbe581fa525a2a8@dizum.com>
"Oh, yeah... it's 2550.25 volts... so why does your graph not even
reach 2500 volts, given that eventually all the sinewaves will
constructively interfere (ie: *add* to each other) to *sum* to 2550.25
volts?"

Fakey, it doesn't reach 2500 volts because the summation of your sinewaves  
never reaches that.  They never reach their max values at the same time.   
That's how stupid you are.

Message-ID: <731d08dcc702b9a8a13077ffc201e91f@dizum.com>
"I most certainly *did* prove otherwise. It can't even arrive at the
correct sinewave summation voltage of 2550.25 volts"

Fakey, you only *proved* that you are too inept to graph the equations and  
notice a few things about the interactions of their frequencies when  
summed.

the next line of code is never executed, but snickers DEFINITELY can't  
figure out why it isn't and instead has a bunch of lame excuses while  
still having not produced a value for t where the sum=2550.25, as he has  
k0okily proklamed in many usenet messages that are archived FOREVER.

*/
   cout << "snickerTurds was right! the sum is " << sum << " at time t=" <<  
t <<endl;
}
- end snickerSinewaveStew.cpp --

-

Fakey irrationally demands a theme song to foam to:
"all I really want your pathetic pwned ass to do is write me a classic  
rock song as tribute to your Usenet Lord and Master..."  
<f4f9193fa7d28b760a9de681e61427e7@dizum.com>

-

Somewhere Abouts Round Fri, 12 Feb 2016 17:25:03 -0500, Friendly  
Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> wrote:

<snicker>

Fag. LOL
Idiot. LOL
Moron. LOL
Tranny. LOL
Libtard. LOL
Crackhead. LOL
GableTard. LOL
DildoRider. LOL
Bad Musician. LOL
Stick Figure. LOL
Terrible Liar. LOL
Sinewave Spammer. LOL
Outerfilthing Stalker. LOL
Talentless FrothMonkey. LOL
Math Challenged Halfwit. LOL
Klimate Katastrophe Kook. LOL
Defeated Tearful Spankard. LOL
Waster Of Time To Save $10. LOL
Worst Maker Of Sinewaves In The History Of Usenet. LOL

<the band strikes up a rousing version of "on top of old smokey">

on top of old snick-ers, all covered with Fag. LOL
is where my usenet lord and mas-ter
can go straight to hell*

*hell doesn't exist.  hope everybody is having a productive evening.

-

http://i.imgur.com/2tH6zVB.jpg

http://cafepress.com/kooktown

http://i.imgur.com/pnWqhSG.jpg

-

If my poasts are offensive to you, you can always block all From: headers  
containing "root@127.0.0.1", unless you are an idiot who would like to  
yammer about "morphing" and maybe try to lodge some frivolous complaints  
to my news provider, then please be sure to ignore this helpful  
information and have fun making an ass of yourself in public.  :)

if that route of silencing those horrid opinions of mine that you  
downloaded to your computer under duress doesn't work you can always try:  
http://i.imgur.com/jlsN9JX.png?2

-

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop
The Gish Gallop is often used as an indirect argument from authority — as  
it appears to paint the galloper as an expert in a broad range of subjects  
or with an extensive knowledge of an individual one. Simultaneously it  
presents opponents (in spoken debates) or refuters (in written,  
Internet-based ones) as incompetent bumblers who didn't do their homework  
before the debate. Such emphasis on style over substance is the reason  
many scientists disdain public debates as a forum for disseminating  
opinions. - Page #1 from the Gospel of SnickerTurd

-

Coming soon!  To a newsgroup near you!:

$ perl fakeyBot.pl
FakeyBot>       I'm FakeyBot. What's your name so I can Google-stalk you,  
look you up on Radaris, and hurl invective and probably-illegal harrassing  
bile from behind an anonymous dizum account?  <snicker>
You>    Robert Michael Wolfe
FakeyBot>       Oh look, you're back again to polish my size 16 steel-toed  
boot with your colon and listen to me talk about bestiality and cocks,  
Robert. <snicker>
Robert> you talk about cocks a lot.
FakeyBot>       Oh, I talk about sex a lot?
Robert> gay sex, mostly...
FakeyBot>       Fag!

(just as useful as the original!)

-

snickers the wonderturd describes how he alerted lots of his kiddie pr0n  
friends to the ensuing FBI sting in message  
<b5e7da79a455d0c9227b1b50e25e7ea1@dizum.com>:
"That's easy enough to do... how do you think my crew uncovered the
largest CP ring using Tor and I2P, which we promptly turned over to
the FBI? I discovered a way to uncover the IP addresses the I2P users were  
using, and a way of tracking Eepsites back to their IP addresses, then we  
figured out that we could DDOS a Tor IP address and modify Tor headers  
while checking whether a Tor hidden service was still up, then using  
process of elimination to pinpoint the IP address hosting that hidden  
service. It's not rocket science.

_The I2P community got all up in arms when I discussed on their forum how  
I was doing it, and that it'd be a good way of cleaning up I2P so it can  
get on with being a platform to research anonymous communication... my  
distinct impression was that the "anonymity
research platform" story was just a cover story to allow pervs to
trade CP._  (NOTE: admits to participating in what he "suspected" was a  
kiddie pr0n network.)

That Silk Road 2.0 was taken offline in the ensuing FBI Operation
Onymous was just icing on the cake."

-

Golden Killfile, June 2005
KOTM, November 2006
Bob Allisat Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, November 2006
Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart, September 2007
Tony Sidaway Memorial "Drama Queen" Award, November 2006
Busted Urinal Award, April 2007
Order of the Holey Sockpuppet, September 2007
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, September 2006
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, April 2008
Tinfoil Sombrero, February 2007
AUK Mascot, September 2007
Putting the Awards Out of Order to Screw With the OCD Fuckheads, March 2016

 

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 06:44 +0100
  Re: Fazer maths for fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-21 14:50 +0800
    Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-21 16:36 +0100
      Re: Fazer maths for fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:22 -0400
        Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 05:36 +0100
      Re: Fazer maths for fakey Skeet <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-03-21 11:27 -0600
        Re: Fazer maths for fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-21 13:38 -0400
        Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:01 +0100
      Re: Fazer maths for fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 02:42 +0800
        Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 06:47 +0100
          Re: Fazer maths for fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 15:19 +0800
            Re: Fazer maths for fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 03:50 -0400
              Re: Fazer maths for fakey Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-03-22 17:02 +0800
                Re: Fazer maths for fakey "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-03-22 12:54 -0400
            Re: Fazer maths for fakey Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-03-22 16:21 +0100
      Re: Fazer maths for fakey vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-03-22 02:20 +0000

csiph-web