Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #631939

Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality

Show all headers | View raw

Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> writes:

>On 5/3/2017 6:46 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/3/2017 6:57 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>>> Alright, let us see if there is a broad connection of the fact that
>>> magnetism attract exists, but repel does not exist and that attract is
>>> 14% stronger than DSSO
>>>



>>> The reason that protons form a nucleus is because like charges attract
>>> and the reason electrons for all together in the space around the
>>> nucleus of an atom is because only attraction exists. But, if you get
>>> one electron to close to another, they deny getting any closer.
>>>
>>> And the pretty part of this story, is that the number 3/3.5 is a form
>>> of 2.71.../3.14....
>>>
>>> AP
>>>
>> Absolute babbling senile gibberish.

>wait a min.,....  "And the pretty part of this story, is that the number 
>3/3.5 is a form of 2.71.../3.14.... "
>3/3.5 = 0.85714285714285714285714285714286
>2.71/3.14 = 0.86305732484076433121019108280255

>they are 0.68529...% different !

Archie also thinks that pi=22/7 and e=19/7.  Or are somehow close enough
so that he claims it somehow justifies his cosmic plutonium atom.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 08:44 -0700
  Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 14:57 -0700
    Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 02:02 -0700
      Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 15:42 -0700
        Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 22:37 -0700
          Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 01:01 -0700
            Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 15:38 -0700
              True genesis of the Universe Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 18:57 -0700
                making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 22:30 -0700
                ASTRO DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 01:02 -0700
                Re: ASTRO 2nd of DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 00:30 -0700
                Re: ASTRO 2nd of DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-02 14:28 +0000
                SOLAR SYSTEM DATA TABLE Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 14:55 -0700
                Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 20:46 -0700
                Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 22:59 -0700
                Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 00:06 -0700
                there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 00:42 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 15:57 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-03 19:46 -0400
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-03 22:47 -0500
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-04 14:40 +0000
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 20:14 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 11:19 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 23:43 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 17:20 -0400
                Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-03 14:29 +0000

csiph-web