Groups > sci.physics > #631914

Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality

From	Serg io <invalid@invalid.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality
Date	2017-05-03 22:47 -0500
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<oee880$50l$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <272a8ae9-9c38-4ee4-895c-b154de840788@googlegroups.com> <058e1e3e-e17b-40f8-9688-65860249cd19@googlegroups.com> <3adebbb5-6719-4bee-93de-a204de044766@googlegroups.com> <bad5a990-06ae-46bb-bbad-5b603ac8ad4a@googlegroups.com> <590a6bba$0$60230$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/3/2017 6:46 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/3/2017 6:57 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
>> Alright, let us see if there is a broad connection of the fact that
>> magnetism attract exists, but repel does not exist and that attract is
>> 14% stronger than DSSO
>>



>> The reason that protons form a nucleus is because like charges attract
>> and the reason electrons for all together in the space around the
>> nucleus of an atom is because only attraction exists. But, if you get
>> one electron to close to another, they deny getting any closer.
>>
>> And the pretty part of this story, is that the number 3/3.5 is a form
>> of 2.71.../3.14....
>>
>> AP
>>
> Absolute babbling senile gibberish.

wait a min.,....  "And the pretty part of this story, is that the number 
3/3.5 is a form of 2.71.../3.14.... "
3/3.5 = 0.85714285714285714285714285714286
2.71/3.14 = 0.86305732484076433121019108280255

they are 0.68529...% different !

Thread

Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 08:44 -0700
  Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 14:57 -0700
    Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 02:02 -0700
      Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 15:42 -0700
        Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 22:37 -0700
          Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 01:01 -0700
            Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 15:38 -0700
              True genesis of the Universe Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 18:57 -0700
                making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 22:30 -0700
                ASTRO DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 01:02 -0700
                Re: ASTRO 2nd of DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 00:30 -0700
                Re: ASTRO 2nd of DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-02 14:28 +0000
                SOLAR SYSTEM DATA TABLE Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 14:55 -0700
                Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 20:46 -0700
                Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 22:59 -0700
                Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 00:06 -0700
                there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 00:42 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 15:57 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-03 19:46 -0400
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-03 22:47 -0500
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-04 14:40 +0000
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 20:14 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 11:19 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 23:43 -0700
                Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 17:20 -0400
                Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-03 14:29 +0000

csiph-web