Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #631076 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-04-28 08:44 -0700 |
| Last post | 2017-05-03 14:29 +0000 |
| Articles | 6 on this page of 26 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to sci.physics
Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 08:44 -0700
Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-28 14:57 -0700
Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 02:02 -0700
Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 15:42 -0700
Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-29 22:37 -0700
Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 01:01 -0700
Newton forgot the Product Rule of Calculus Re: Re-doing all physics starting off with F=m(a1+a2), not F=ma, 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 15:38 -0700
True genesis of the Universe Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 18:57 -0700
making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-04-30 22:30 -0700
ASTRO DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-01 01:02 -0700
Re: ASTRO 2nd of DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 00:30 -0700
Re: ASTRO 2nd of DATA TABLE Re: making all astronomy be the accounting of either Faraday or Ampere laws Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-02 14:28 +0000
SOLAR SYSTEM DATA TABLE Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 14:55 -0700
Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 20:46 -0700
Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-02 22:59 -0700
Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 00:06 -0700
there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 00:42 -0700
Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 15:57 -0700
Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-05-03 19:46 -0400
Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-03 22:47 -0500
Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-04 14:40 +0000
Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-03 20:14 -0700
Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 11:19 -0700
Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> - 2017-05-04 23:43 -0700
Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-05 17:20 -0400
Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2017-05-03 14:29 +0000
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-04 14:40 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality |
| Message-ID | <oefego$1ak$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #631914 |
Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> writes: >On 5/3/2017 6:46 PM, benj wrote: >> On 5/3/2017 6:57 PM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: >>> Alright, let us see if there is a broad connection of the fact that >>> magnetism attract exists, but repel does not exist and that attract is >>> 14% stronger than DSSO >>> >>> The reason that protons form a nucleus is because like charges attract >>> and the reason electrons for all together in the space around the >>> nucleus of an atom is because only attraction exists. But, if you get >>> one electron to close to another, they deny getting any closer. >>> >>> And the pretty part of this story, is that the number 3/3.5 is a form >>> of 2.71.../3.14.... >>> >>> AP >>> >> Absolute babbling senile gibberish. >wait a min.,.... "And the pretty part of this story, is that the number >3/3.5 is a form of 2.71.../3.14.... " >3/3.5 = 0.85714285714285714285714285714286 >2.71/3.14 = 0.86305732484076433121019108280255 >they are 0.68529...% different ! Archie also thinks that pi=22/7 and e=19/7. Or are somehow close enough so that he claims it somehow justifies his cosmic plutonium atom.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-03 20:14 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality |
| Message-ID | <9bfe103a-1581-4c4e-be26-05bf46527602@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #631880 |
Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 20:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 03:46:28 +0000 Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Repeated the experiment of the German company that found attract magnetism is 5-10% stronger than repel. Last time i did this i found 7% stronger. But under poor conditions since i used unequal magnets. Under better controls i find the attract is 14% stronger, 3/3.5 AP On Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 10:55:54 PM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: attract magnetism 14% stronger repel Re: Is Sun moving in Faraday's law or Ampere's law to Vega?? 8th ed Atom Totality Repeated the experiment of the German company that found attract magnetism is 5-10% stronger than repel. Last time i did this i found 7% stronger. But under poor conditions since i used unequal magnets. Under better controls i find the attract is 14% stronger, 3/3.5 AP On Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 12:59:24 AM UTC-5, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality - show quoted text - Was looking to see if 85% or 86% comes up again in physics, or its complement 15% or 14% and strangely enough in Bell Inequality. AP Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 00:06:38 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 07:06:38 +0000 Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality Holy, holy,holy, smokes, pi is 3.14 and e is 2.71 2.71/3.14 is 86% So that attraction in EM follows 3.14.... And Repel is Pauli Exclusion Denial of Same Space Occupancy follows 2.71.... What a beautiful law of physics. AP Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 00:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 07:42:28 +0000 there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality - show quoted text - Alright, I should describe in detail this experiment performed tonight. It is a repeat of a German Company Magnete of their results that attraction is 5-10% stronger than repel. In my first experiment I had no assistance, to hold things or to observe and help. And I had strong unequal magnets. Today I had assistance and I had two equal magnets that were far less strong (neodynium) magnets. What I had was a plastic shaped in a L form, only the two sides were equal in distance as a channel or road for the two magnets to follow. I masking taped a marker for my control magnet of a distance and the approach magnet was masking taped markered so I could easy read the numbers in centimeters. So, when the two attract magnets were at a distance separation of 3.5 cm they flew together And, with like poles, they started to move apart at 3 cm separation. In other words, attraction is .5 cm stronger. Very very simple to do experiment. And extremely important, for it is proof that in EM theory, only a force of attraction exists. What we thought was repel, is not repel at all, but is a denial of the same space occupancy, a Pauli Exclusion Principle. When like poles of magnets get close, it is the magnetic fields in both that are denying one another. Remember, it is not repel, but a denial. But it is an attraction of unlike. And what that means is that like also attracts, because there is no repel. The reason that protons form a nucleus is because like charges attract and the reason electrons for all together in the space around the nucleus of an atom is because only attraction exists. But, if you get one electron to close to another, they deny getting any closer. And the pretty part of this story, is that the number 3/3.5 is a form of 2.71.../3.14.... AP Newsgroups: sci.physics Date: Wed, 3 May 2017 18:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: attract magnetism 14% stronger repel Re: Is Sun moving in Faraday's law or Ampere's law to Vega?? 8th ed Atom Totality From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium....@gmail.com> Injection-Date: Thu, 04 May 2017 01:08:16 +0000 attract magnetism 14% stronger repel Re: Is Sun moving in Faraday's law or Ampere's law to Vega?? 8th ed Atom Totality One of the world's most important physics experiments-- attract magnetism is 14% stronger than repel. It means gravity is electromagnetism. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-04 11:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality |
| Message-ID | <67013e7a-859b-4305-b56b-e290deaa8da2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #631906 |
Alright, we shall replace the name of the fundamental theorem of calculus with a more appropriate geometry name-- the right triangle hinged 5 rightangled-gon = rectangle theorem. Here is how the theorem works. Take any rectangle and this rectangle will be a Calculus integral partition. The smaller side of this rectangle will be the width. Mark the midpoint of the width by m. Now m is the hinge point that the cutaway right triangle will swivel on the 5 gon. With a scissors starting at m, cut out a right triangle and swivel it on hinge m so that the 5-gon is now a 4-gon right angle trapezoid. What was constructed by the trapezoid is the derivative at m is this hypotenuse as derivative slope. The process is reversible-- trapezoid to rectangle, rectangle to trapezoid. There, there is a pure geometry proof of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Completely skips and ignores the Limit concept for it is a phony concept. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-04 23:43 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality |
| Message-ID | <f8a7bbef-29e5-42ec-9c22-ea742825c5c2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #631954 |
If gravity = EM, could there be an astro body, like AC current changes direction of motion? We certainly would take notice of something like that. AP
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | benj <nobody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-05 17:20 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: there is no repel force in EM theory, just a deny principle Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality |
| Message-ID | <590ceca5$0$60296$c3e8da3$66d3cc2f@news.astraweb.com> |
| In reply to | #632003 |
On 05/05/2017 02:43 AM, Archimedes Plutonium wrote: > If gravity = EM, could there be an astro body, like AC current changes direction of motion? > > We certainly would take notice of something like that. > > AP > Gravity does not equal EM you raving senile lunatic! Gravity is due to a secret radiation that is NOT EM. Why don't yo go to McDonalds and get someone there to write some physics on the slate hanging around your geezer neck?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-05-03 14:29 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: Repeat of experiment-- attract is 14% stronger repel Re: 8th ed Atom Totality |
| Message-ID | <oecpgd$n0k$1@pcls7.std.com> |
| In reply to | #631811 |
Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com> writes: >Holy, holy,holy, smokes, pi is 3.14 and e is 2.71 >2.71/3.14 is 86% >So that attraction in EM follows 3.14.... And Repel is Pauli Exclusion >Denial of Same Space Occupancy follows 2.71.... >What a beautiful law of physics. Wow, just wow. Is that really your understanding how physics works? Babble on a topic on sci.physics for a while, do a little numerology, jump to a wild conclusion and state "I, Archimedes Plutonium, do hereby proclaim a New Law of Physics, which is True because I Say So!" In the science fair I mentioned a couple of days ago, such behavior would get a big fat F as a grade. How does it feel that a sixth grader does science better than that? And then, if someone actually points out a flaw in your logic, instead of doing what a real scientists does and corrects the flaw, you instead project your own failure onto the person pointing out the flaw and anyone else who did so in the past. Just like what you are about to do to me when you reply to this.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | sci.physics
csiph-web