Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #617480
| From | Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Thermodynamicists Are More Insane Than Einsteinians |
| Date | 2017-02-07 19:17 -0600 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <o7drjp$1unt$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <6e3fa2e5-4bb2-47bb-b526-194a18b7e99b@googlegroups.com> <b0f86320-d5c1-4893-adb3-039933574977@googlegroups.com> <30a26d98-7272-4c2f-91aa-928dda052764@googlegroups.com> |
On 2/6/2017 5:40 PM, Double-A wrote: > On Monday, February 6, 2017 at 2:36:42 PM UTC-8, Pentcho Valev > wrote: >> Entropy is not a state function. This means that any statement >> http://mutuslab.cs.uwindsor.ca/schurko/introphyschem/lectures/240_l10.pdf >> "Carnot Cycles: S is a State Function. Any reversible cycle can be >> thought of as a collection of Carnot cycles - this approximation >> becomes exact as cycles become infinitesimal. Entropy change around >> an individual cycle is zero. Sum of entropy changes over all cycles >> is zero." > >> Conclusion: The belief that the entropy is a state function is >> totally unjustified. The part of thermodynamics based on the >> entropy concept is not even wrong. >> >> http://www.eoht.info/page/Neumann-Shannon+anecdote "...Shannon was >> wavering on whether or not to call his new logarithmic statistical >> formulation of data in signal transmission by the name of >> 'information' or 'uncertainty', to which question Neumann suggested >> that Shannon use neither names, but rather use the name 'entropy' >> of thermodynamics, because: (a) the statistical mechanics version >> of the entropy equations have the same mathematical isomorphism and >> (b) nobody really knows what entropy really is so he will have the >> advantage in winning any arguments that might erupt." >> >> Pentcho Valev > > > I just found my old Thermodynamics textbook. I shouldn't study it? > > Double-A > I think the books are OK. But all those loose Thermodynamicsts running around without their hats on... , he is saying they are nutzoid.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thermodynamicists Are More Insane Than Einsteinians Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-06 07:55 -0800
Re: Thermodynamicists Are More Insane Than Einsteinians Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2017-02-06 15:40 -0800
Re: Thermodynamicists Are More Insane Than Einsteinians Serg Io <invliad@invalid.com> - 2017-02-07 19:17 -0600
Re: Thermodynamicists Are More Insane Than Einsteinians Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 06:38 -0800
Re: Thermodynamicists Are More Insane Than Einsteinians Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 14:28 -0800
Re: Thermodynamicists Are More Insane Than Einsteinians Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-07 16:34 -0800
Re: Thermodynamicists Are More Insane Than Einsteinians Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2017-02-09 11:52 -0800
csiph-web