Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #600358
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time |
| Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2016 06:02:04 +0200 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Lines | 29 |
| Message-ID | <ntho7c$das$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <47eeb7db-ef85-40b3-8a50-0e1b71863a8c@googlegroups.com> <49397f76-7367-475b-94d8-ba2c725abf8c@googlegroups.com> <36921732a81b1f83a7204272082d79e0@dizum.com> <ntf8ts$dks$1@dont-email.me> <01800b1aa51e081e7f5c5f3abc0de428@dizum.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 11 Oct 2016 04:01:48 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="b702d8016437113a5a5b5365420c28a8"; logging-data="13660"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19cJSmO95LnWB/LhcPif1wS" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <01800b1aa51e081e7f5c5f3abc0de428@dizum.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:VTfDSGT1NXHDcbUdUvSO2rYwDhU= |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:600358 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Dne 11/10/2016 v 04:44 Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 napsal(a): > >> By the same way as your cloth >> cools you by intensive thermal radiation >> and therefore you should not use it >> to warm yourself up..... > > False analogy. Cloth is an insulator by blocking circulation of air. False. About 2/3 of the body thermal loses are due to radiation. > While CO2 is an efficient absorber of infrared, it's also an efficient > *emitter*... so heat gets absorbed in the lower atmosphere, gets > circulated up into the upper atmosphere by convection, where it is > released on the night-side of the planet in the 11-micron infrared > atmospheric window, allowing that heat nearly unfettered escape to > space. What you have missed is, that the effect of CO2 is lowering Earth emission temperature at affected wavelengths. BTW, your vocabulary is a strong indirect evidence you cannot be taken seriously. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 12:12 -0700
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-10 05:01 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 07:28 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 04:44 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 06:02 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 07:03 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:16 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:21 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 06:07 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 06:17 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 07:34 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-13 06:58 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:52 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 08:43 -0500
combustion, vapor of that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:42 -0700
Re: combustion, vapor of that Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 02:48 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:36 +0200
tardo-nado noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:39 -0700
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time THE STINGER <bzz.bzz.bzz@sting.sting.sting> - 2016-10-11 08:55 +0200
csiph-web