Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #600218
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time |
| Date | 2016-10-10 07:28 +0200 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <ntf8ts$dks$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <47eeb7db-ef85-40b3-8a50-0e1b71863a8c@googlegroups.com> <49397f76-7367-475b-94d8-ba2c725abf8c@googlegroups.com> <36921732a81b1f83a7204272082d79e0@dizum.com> |
Dne 10/10/2016 v 05:01 Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1 napsal(a): > > Um, Jim? You're talking to the guy who proved that CO2-driven AGW > violates the Laws of Thermodynamics, and thus is a fairy tale. CO2 has > been proven by NASA to be a global *cooling* gas. > By the same way as your cloth cools you by intensive thermal radiation and therefore you should not use it to warm yourself up..... -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 12:12 -0700
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-10 05:01 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 07:28 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 04:44 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 06:02 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 07:03 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:16 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:21 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 06:07 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 06:17 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 07:34 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-13 06:58 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:52 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 08:43 -0500
combustion, vapor of that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:42 -0700
Re: combustion, vapor of that Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 02:48 +0200
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:36 +0200
tardo-nado noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:39 -0700
Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time THE STINGER <bzz.bzz.bzz@sting.sting.sting> - 2016-10-11 08:55 +0200
csiph-web