Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time

From	Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time
Date	2016-10-11 06:02 +0200
Organization	Good company
Message-ID	<ntho7c$das$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<47eeb7db-ef85-40b3-8a50-0e1b71863a8c@googlegroups.com> <49397f76-7367-475b-94d8-ba2c725abf8c@googlegroups.com> <36921732a81b1f83a7204272082d79e0@dizum.com> <ntf8ts$dks$1@dont-email.me> <01800b1aa51e081e7f5c5f3abc0de428@dizum.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Dne 11/10/2016 v 04:44 Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus,
DoW #1 napsal(a):

> 
>> By the same way as your cloth
>> cools you by intensive thermal radiation
>> and therefore you should not use it
>> to warm yourself up.....
> 
> False analogy. Cloth is an insulator by blocking circulation of air.

False. About 2/3 of the body thermal loses are due to radiation.

> While CO2 is an efficient absorber of infrared, it's also an efficient 
> *emitter*... so heat gets absorbed in the lower atmosphere, gets 
> circulated up into the upper atmosphere by convection, where it is 
> released on the night-side of the planet in the 11-micron infrared 
> atmospheric window, allowing that heat nearly unfettered escape to 
> space.

What you have missed is, that the effect of CO2
is lowering Earth emission temperature at affected wavelengths.

BTW, your vocabulary is a strong indirect evidence
you cannot be taken seriously.

-- 
Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer )
Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.

Thread

Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-10-09 12:12 -0700
  Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-10 05:01 +0200
    Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-10 07:28 +0200
      Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 04:44 +0200
        Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 06:02 +0200
          Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-11 07:03 +0200
            Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:16 +0200
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 07:21 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 06:07 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 06:17 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 07:34 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-13 06:58 +0200
                Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:52 +0200
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-11 08:43 -0500
                combustion, vapor of that noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-11 12:42 -0700
                Re: combustion, vapor of that Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 02:48 +0200
              Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time "Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus, DoW #1" <FNVWe@alt.usenet.kooks.xxx> - 2016-10-12 07:36 +0200
                tardo-nado noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 11:39 -0700
            Re: H2O surface tension properly explained for the first time THE STINGER <bzz.bzz.bzz@sting.sting.sting> - 2016-10-11 08:55 +0200

csiph-web