Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #579920
| From | moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Questions for Eisteinians |
| Date | 2016-05-23 22:22 +0000 |
| Organization | The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989 |
| Message-ID | <nhvvr6$9v7$2@pcls7.std.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <11579c93-9dba-4615-846d-97d53eb033dc@googlegroups.com> <nhtdkt$d9i$1@pcls7.std.com> <88ab14bb-c821-4899-b829-02cca9ffae96@googlegroups.com> <nhvfri$95r$1@pcls7.std.com> <72ec89f1-629a-49a7-8e00-261fd085b32a@googlegroups.com> |
kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >On Monday, May 23, 2016 at 1:50:16 PM UTC-4, Michael Moroney wrote: >> kenseto <setoken@att.net> writes: >> >> >The point is that that's why SR is an incomplete theory. That's why I >> >invented IRT. >> >> But IRT is coming up with a possibility that is not suggested by the math. >That's why SRT math is incomplete. What, you think you can add unsupported ideas wiy-nilly to a theory, and that makes it more "complete"? I just call it unsupported crap. >> This is because if A sees B moving at a velocity v, B will see A as moving >> at a velocity of -v. >No.....A uses his clock to determine B is moving wrt him at Vab and B uses >his clock to determine A is moving at speed Vba. Yes, and according to the symmetry of relativity, Vba = -Vab. I just wrote v and -v rather than Vab and Vba. >> However, the computation of gamma depends on the >> square of the velocity, and (-v)^2 is equal to v^2, so both get the exact >> same value for gamma. Therefore each sees the other's clock as running >> gamma times slower, never faster. >You calculations is based on the following bogus assumptions: >1. A and B clock second contain the same amount of time. IOW , A clock >second is a universal interval of time.....it is not. The concept of proper time means that A always sees A's clock run at the normal rate. And B always sees B's clock run at its normal rate. This is part of SR, the concept of proper time. >2.You assumed that each predicts the other clock runs slow by a factor of >1/gamma. This is wrong. No, I just _showed_ that each sees the other's clock runs slow. Both A and B come up with the same gamma, and each sees the same thing in the other. You may think it's a contradiction but it's not. A and B are measuring _different things_. In one case, two readings of Clock A1 are compared first to Clock B1 and then to Clock B2. In the other case, two readings of Clock B1 are compared to Clock A1 and then to Clock A2. Two different things. > Each must include the possibility that the other >clock is running fast by a factor of gamma. Since the math never suggests that, and the two time measurements are of two different things, there simply is no reason to do so.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-21 14:36 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 16:45 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-21 15:53 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 18:54 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 17:22 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-22 05:51 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:06 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-05-22 13:42 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 17:55 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:18 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-21 16:01 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-21 16:16 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:25 +0200
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-22 06:45 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 04:56 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-22 05:22 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:15 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 15:39 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 07:34 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 08:51 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 12:55 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 14:56 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:05 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 13:33 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 22:24 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-24 06:31 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:30 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-24 14:35 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 18:14 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 20:33 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 06:35 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-24 06:56 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:52 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-25 08:02 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:11 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:40 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-25 13:56 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 16:18 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 16:01 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 20:26 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:32 -0400
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 20:31 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-24 10:54 -0400
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 10:21 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-24 14:16 -0400
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 14:15 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 06:23 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-25 23:29 -0400
Re: Questions for Eisteinians HVAC <mr.hvac@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 08:46 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-24 13:37 -0400
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-25 08:26 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 08:01 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-25 07:51 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:00 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:23 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 13:09 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:24 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:38 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-22 01:30 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-22 06:11 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 08:19 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-22 06:49 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-22 11:27 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:29 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-22 22:59 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 07:41 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 17:49 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 13:20 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:26 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-23 22:22 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-24 06:30 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-24 14:32 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:34 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:27 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 13:10 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:40 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 11:15 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 13:03 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:27 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-23 15:38 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-23 14:51 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 06:30 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-24 06:51 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:42 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-25 08:08 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:12 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:42 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:47 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 09:41 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-24 09:18 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 11:25 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-25 07:37 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 10:07 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Mikkel Haaheim <mikkelhaaheim@gmail.com> - 2016-05-24 11:50 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-25 08:23 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-25 16:50 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-25 13:58 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-25 21:39 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-25 17:11 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-05-26 02:53 +0000
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-26 09:42 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 11:51 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2016-05-26 09:32 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 12:02 -0500
Re: Questions for Eisteinians "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-05-26 10:33 -0700
Re: Questions for Eisteinians benj <nobodyxx@gmail> - 2016-05-26 14:15 -0400
csiph-web