Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #569533
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 1.9801E+35 joules |
| Date | 2016-04-10 15:56 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <neeekv$bko$2@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <8715f7bb-c7f9-4dcb-8639-a34076567916@googlegroups.com> <nec3dm$1f9i$4@macpro.inf.ed.ac.uk> <8c2cd36c-a3de-4442-aa63-4baa7172a897@googlegroups.com> |
On 4/9/2016 7:57 PM, Peter Riedt wrote: > On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 7:35:03 AM UTC+8, Richard Tobin wrote: >> In article <8715f7bb-c7f9-4dcb-8639-a34076567916@googlegroups.com>, >> Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> The energy E the sun needs to apply to keep nine planets in orbit >> >> At what rate does it apply this energy? >> >> -- Richard > > F = ma > Peter, I know you enjoy being part of a physics discussion. However, being cryptic is not a good mask for being ignorant. -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 13:46 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 16:34 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 16:36 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 19:14 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 19:17 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:46 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 09:37 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:50 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 19:25 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 07:39 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 07:47 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:35 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 00:54 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 10:07 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 12:56 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 18:03 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-04-09 21:36 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 21:52 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:46 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:58 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 08:05 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 00:46 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 10:08 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 01:30 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 11:34 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 18:12 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 06:46 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:01 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 22:45 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 22:53 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:10 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:14 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:36 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 23:50 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:28 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-11 17:32 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:15 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:47 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2016-04-09 23:32 +0000
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 17:57 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:00 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 18:06 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:10 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 21:27 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:42 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:39 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:56 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2016-04-11 15:53 +0000
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-11 17:31 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 23:36 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 23:56 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 09:39 +0200
csiph-web