Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #569393
| From | Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: 1.9801E+35 joules |
| Date | 2016-04-10 09:39 +0200 |
| Organization | Good company |
| Message-ID | <necvpc$1k1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <8715f7bb-c7f9-4dcb-8639-a34076567916@googlegroups.com> <39c668e0-1356-40b3-b4ef-d9e182f7e02b@googlegroups.com> <dc7cedf5-7547-4a55-a336-2c8e03fbee00@googlegroups.com> |
Dne 10/04/2016 v 08:56 Peter Riedt napsal(a): > On Sunday, April 10, 2016 at 2:36:51 PM UTC+8, Y.Porat wrote: > > Eccentricity is evidence that an increase or decrease of gravitational force varies orbits. Changed gravity is a sufficient, but not essential reason for eccentricity. -- Poutnik ( The Pilgrim, Der Wanderer ) Knowledge makes great men humble, but small men arrogant.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 13:46 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 16:34 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-08 16:36 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 19:14 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 19:17 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:46 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 09:37 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:50 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-08 19:25 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 07:39 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 07:47 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 08:35 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 00:54 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 10:07 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 12:56 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 18:03 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules omnilobe@gmail.com - 2016-04-09 21:36 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 21:52 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:46 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:58 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 08:05 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 00:46 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 10:08 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 01:30 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 11:34 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 18:12 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 06:46 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:01 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 22:45 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 22:53 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:10 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:14 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 08:36 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-10 23:50 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:28 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-11 17:32 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-11 07:15 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:47 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2016-04-09 23:32 +0000
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 17:57 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:00 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 18:06 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 20:10 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 21:27 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:42 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 07:39 +0200
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 15:56 -0500
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin) - 2016-04-11 15:53 +0000
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-11 17:31 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 23:36 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Peter Riedt <riedt1@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-04-09 23:56 -0700
Re: 1.9801E+35 joules Poutnik <poutnik4nntp@gmail.com> - 2016-04-10 09:39 +0200
csiph-web