Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #550987

Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Sylvia Else wrote:
>> And Paul, in your single statement you already did a couple of
>> mistakes,
>> and certainly also you have them in your hompage. SR predicts ZERO and
>> two MAXIMA, let's see whether you know the location of these points.
>>
> SR is known not to apply in this situation because of the effects of
> gravity. Sylvia.

Which reveals you are not aware of what is going on in physics, young 
lady. Nothing in the entire world may cancel the effects of SR. In this 
context SR is stronger than GR. Since GR may have various stochastic 
interpretations, SR is, and will persist being about motion. You don't 
understand physics, young lady.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-06 12:59 +0000
  Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-07 09:51 +1100
    Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Éibhear <eibhear@no-email.net> - 2016-02-06 23:17 +0000
      Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-07 10:46 +1100
        Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Éibhear <eibhear@no-email.net> - 2016-02-07 00:46 +0000
      Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-06 21:57 -0600
        Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Καλυψώ <calipso214@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:33 +0000
          Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-08 17:24 +0000

csiph-web