Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity

From	Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity
Date	2016-02-07 10:46 +1100
Message-ID	<dhneukFafj6U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(17 earlier) <dhlq86FrlkhU1@mid.individual.net> <n94p2i$qf0$1@news.albasani.net> <n94qnj$1vtl$1@gioia.aioe.org> <dhnbmmF9mofU2@mid.individual.net> <n95uu5$1rde$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/02/2016 10:17 AM, Éibhear wrote:
> Sylvia Else wrote:
>>> And Paul, in your single statement you already did a couple of
>>> mistakes,
>>> and certainly also you have them in your hompage. SR predicts ZERO and
>>> two MAXIMA, let's see whether you know the location of these points.
>>>
>> SR is known not to apply in this situation because of the effects of
>> gravity. Sylvia.
>
> Which reveals you are not aware of what is going on in physics, young
> lady. Nothing in the entire world may cancel the effects of SR. In this
> context SR is stronger than GR. Since GR may have various stochastic
> interpretations, SR is, and will persist being about motion. You don't
> understand physics, young lady.
>

What's that nonsense? GR is a generalisation of SR to include the 
effects of gravity. It is not a distinct theory.

Sylvia.

Thread

Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-06 12:59 +0000
  Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-07 09:51 +1100
    Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Éibhear <eibhear@no-email.net> - 2016-02-06 23:17 +0000
      Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-07 10:46 +1100
        Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Éibhear <eibhear@no-email.net> - 2016-02-07 00:46 +0000
      Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-06 21:57 -0600
        Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Καλυψώ <calipso214@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:33 +0000
          Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-08 17:24 +0000

csiph-web