Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #550984
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity |
| Date | 2016-02-07 09:51 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <dhnbmmF9mofU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <dhkvvvFlunmU1@mid.individual.net> <n94ahn$dve$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <dhlq86FrlkhU1@mid.individual.net> <n94p2i$qf0$1@news.albasani.net> <n94qnj$1vtl$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 6/02/2016 11:59 PM, shan wrote: > Użytkownik Paul B. Andersen napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych: > >>> next to them. They do this so that they count seconds at the same rate >>> that a clock sitting on Earth counts them. The required adjustment was >>> calculated using general relativity. >> >> As Sylvia but not Maciej know: >> GR predicts that a clock in GPS orbit will run fast by a factor >> 4.4546E-10 as observed from the ground. >> https://paulba.no/paper/Ashby.pdf quote (page 16-17): > > And Paul, in your single statement you already did a couple of mistakes, > and certainly also you have them in your hompage. SR predicts ZERO and two > MAXIMA, let's see whether you know the location of these points. > SR is known not to apply in this situation because of the effects of gravity. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-06 12:59 +0000
Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-07 09:51 +1100
Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Éibhear <eibhear@no-email.net> - 2016-02-06 23:17 +0000
Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-07 10:46 +1100
Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Éibhear <eibhear@no-email.net> - 2016-02-07 00:46 +0000
Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-06 21:57 -0600
Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Καλυψώ <calipso214@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:33 +0000
Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-08 17:24 +0000
csiph-web