Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #550984

Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity

From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity
Date 2016-02-07 09:51 +1100
Message-ID <dhnbmmF9mofU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (15 earlier) <dhkvvvFlunmU1@mid.individual.net> <n94ahn$dve$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <dhlq86FrlkhU1@mid.individual.net> <n94p2i$qf0$1@news.albasani.net> <n94qnj$1vtl$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 6/02/2016 11:59 PM, shan wrote:
> Użytkownik Paul B. Andersen napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:
>
>>> next to them. They do this so that they count seconds at the same rate
>>> that a clock sitting on Earth counts them. The required adjustment was
>>> calculated using general relativity.
>>
>> As Sylvia but not Maciej know:
>> GR predicts that a clock in GPS orbit will run fast by a factor
>> 4.4546E-10 as observed from the ground.
>> https://paulba.no/paper/Ashby.pdf quote (page 16-17):
>
> And Paul, in your single statement you already did a couple of mistakes,
> and certainly also you have them in your hompage. SR predicts ZERO and two
> MAXIMA, let's see whether you know the location of these points.
>

SR is known not to apply in this situation because of the effects of 
gravity.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity shan <shan@enterapps.org> - 2016-02-06 12:59 +0000
  Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-07 09:51 +1100
    Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Éibhear <eibhear@no-email.net> - 2016-02-06 23:17 +0000
      Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-02-07 10:46 +1100
        Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Éibhear <eibhear@no-email.net> - 2016-02-07 00:46 +0000
      Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Tom Roberts <tjroberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2016-02-06 21:57 -0600
        Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Καλυψώ <calipso214@hotmail.com> - 2016-02-08 15:33 +0000
          Re: Einstein's Length Contraction Absurdity Heiðr Einherjar <einherjar@notformail.org> - 2016-02-08 17:24 +0000

csiph-web