Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #603389

Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics
Date Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:42:12 -0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 76
Sender Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID <krlned-rr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References <15c5c97e-9b08-4476-b664-68ec529ba513@googlegroups.com> <6614e6fc-1642-4ba0-8663-cd3655258414@googlegroups.com> <nuqd2h$fm9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <58127dc2$0$40452$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> <nv36r5$1a9a$9@gioia.aioe.org> <5817cf7f$0$31241$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <an0led-jfl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <5817e30a$0$10081$c3e8da3$b1356c67@news.astraweb.com> <4nkled-adn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <5819140d$0$1593$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com>
Injection-Info mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="33e22a1fbc0d811ef1b054043b39a73e"; logging-data="6851"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+G7bq+OU0sWX0R03mFBsfs"
User-Agent tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock sha1:fURKEFMzx9Mm+4IDyLZHfN/HoxQ=
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:603389

Show key headers only | View raw


benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/1/2016 1:10 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 10/31/2016 7:29 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/29/2016 6:11 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/27/2016 5:20 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/26/2016 10:02 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/26/2016 6:53 AM, john wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I think politics has killed Physics.
>>>>>>>>> When Tesla died,
>>>>>>>>> his ideas were not shared.
>>>>>>>>> The US government came and
>>>>>>>>> confiscated them.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For what purpose?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> To look them over and see if there was anything of interest to them,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And why would confiscating them and preventing them from being in public
>>>>>> view serve this purpose? You think the government can only benefit from
>>>>>> ideas if they hide them away? Why would the government have to
>>>>>> CONFISCATE Tesla's ideas? What would they possibly gain?
>>>>>
>>>>> What an absolute IDIOT statement! Why the hell is so many things
>>>>> "clasified". Serves no purpose you say. How could government benefit
>>>>> form hiding technology from those who would use it against the country.
>>>>> And why would the government have to CONFISCATE the papers of Tesla
>>>>> which they couldn't get legally? I mean why would they even have an
>>>>> interest in the ideas of the guy who was the genius who just about
>>>>> invented the 20th century. I mean that makes no sense right?
>>>>>
>>>>> God you are as senile and ignornat as Bert. Do you live in your van and
>>>>> shit in a bucket?
>>>>>
>>>>>>> obviously, (especially with Tesla jammering in the newspapers about
>>>>>>> inventing a "death ray" to shoot down airplanes). And gosh, years later
>>>>>>> somehow the government has this "star wars" program to develop...wait
>>>>>>> for it... yeah, a "death ray" to shoot down missiles. Coincidence?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Quite possibly. Lasers didn't exist in Tesla's day but they certainly do
>>>>>> now. You have one in your DVD player.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who said his "death ray" was a laser? YOu debunkers are always throwing
>>>>> chaff into to wind. HAve you ro HVAC ever had an honest discussion in
>>>>> your lives?
>>>>>
>>>>> PS. Have YOU ever worked on classified technology? Were YOU ever been
>>>>> employed on SDI developing "death rays"?  You know, there Boinker, a
>>>>> death ray takes a bit more brain power than it takes to make wooden toys.
>>>>
>>>> As SDI was all about destroying or at least disabling unmanned stuff
>>>> coming from space, a "death ray" would be useless.
>>>
>>> Depends if you are "killing" people or incoming hardware. You and Odd
>>> are about as ignorant as they come. You must be an engineer. Go tell
>>> John about all the aliens you talked to.
>>
>> Was there supposed to be a point to this disjointed babble other than
>> to demonstrate you are incapable of putting together a coherent paragraph?
> 
> I know (and anyone else familiar with science and the historical facts 
> knows what it's about. But you just do your senile Bert act repeating 
> journalist tripe and telling everybody you know science.

Science and historical facts like Tesla died before lasers were invented?

> All you know how to do is just rattle on with nonsense and then justify 
> it all by saying everone else is a "kook".

Not everyone, you specifically, kook.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 02:22 -0700
  Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 04:53 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-10-26 15:19 +0200
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-10-26 13:48 +0000
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 09:02 -0500
      Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-27 18:20 -0400
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-28 00:07 +0000
          Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:45 -0400
            Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-29 23:27 +0000
              Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 19:13 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-31 23:26 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 20:32 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 05:06 +0000
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 17:11 -0500
          Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 19:10 -0400
            Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-31 23:29 +0000
              Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 20:34 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 05:10 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 18:15 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 23:42 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-02 17:01 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-02 22:58 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-03 16:55 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-03 21:29 +0000
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-26 09:24 -0500
      Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 07:30 -0700
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-26 10:24 -0500
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 16:13 -0500
  Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 08:05 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-27 07:11 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:58 -0700

csiph-web