Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #603389
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics |
| Date | Tue, 1 Nov 2016 23:42:12 -0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 76 |
| Sender | Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com> |
| Message-ID | <krlned-rr.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <15c5c97e-9b08-4476-b664-68ec529ba513@googlegroups.com> <6614e6fc-1642-4ba0-8663-cd3655258414@googlegroups.com> <nuqd2h$fm9$1@gioia.aioe.org> <58127dc2$0$40452$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> <nv36r5$1a9a$9@gioia.aioe.org> <5817cf7f$0$31241$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <an0led-jfl.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <5817e30a$0$10081$c3e8da3$b1356c67@news.astraweb.com> <4nkled-adn.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <5819140d$0$1593$c3e8da3$12bcf670@news.astraweb.com> |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="33e22a1fbc0d811ef1b054043b39a73e"; logging-data="6851"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+G7bq+OU0sWX0R03mFBsfs" |
| User-Agent | tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc)) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:fURKEFMzx9Mm+4IDyLZHfN/HoxQ= |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:603389 |
Show key headers only | View raw
benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: > On 11/1/2016 1:10 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>> On 10/31/2016 7:29 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote: >>>>> On 10/29/2016 6:11 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>> On 10/27/2016 5:20 PM, benj wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/26/2016 10:02 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote: >>>>>>>> On 10/26/2016 6:53 AM, john wrote: >>>>>>>>> I think politics has killed Physics. >>>>>>>>> When Tesla died, >>>>>>>>> his ideas were not shared. >>>>>>>>> The US government came and >>>>>>>>> confiscated them. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For what purpose? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> To look them over and see if there was anything of interest to them, >>>>>> >>>>>> And why would confiscating them and preventing them from being in public >>>>>> view serve this purpose? You think the government can only benefit from >>>>>> ideas if they hide them away? Why would the government have to >>>>>> CONFISCATE Tesla's ideas? What would they possibly gain? >>>>> >>>>> What an absolute IDIOT statement! Why the hell is so many things >>>>> "clasified". Serves no purpose you say. How could government benefit >>>>> form hiding technology from those who would use it against the country. >>>>> And why would the government have to CONFISCATE the papers of Tesla >>>>> which they couldn't get legally? I mean why would they even have an >>>>> interest in the ideas of the guy who was the genius who just about >>>>> invented the 20th century. I mean that makes no sense right? >>>>> >>>>> God you are as senile and ignornat as Bert. Do you live in your van and >>>>> shit in a bucket? >>>>> >>>>>>> obviously, (especially with Tesla jammering in the newspapers about >>>>>>> inventing a "death ray" to shoot down airplanes). And gosh, years later >>>>>>> somehow the government has this "star wars" program to develop...wait >>>>>>> for it... yeah, a "death ray" to shoot down missiles. Coincidence? >>>>>> >>>>>> Quite possibly. Lasers didn't exist in Tesla's day but they certainly do >>>>>> now. You have one in your DVD player. >>>>> >>>>> Who said his "death ray" was a laser? YOu debunkers are always throwing >>>>> chaff into to wind. HAve you ro HVAC ever had an honest discussion in >>>>> your lives? >>>>> >>>>> PS. Have YOU ever worked on classified technology? Were YOU ever been >>>>> employed on SDI developing "death rays"? You know, there Boinker, a >>>>> death ray takes a bit more brain power than it takes to make wooden toys. >>>> >>>> As SDI was all about destroying or at least disabling unmanned stuff >>>> coming from space, a "death ray" would be useless. >>> >>> Depends if you are "killing" people or incoming hardware. You and Odd >>> are about as ignorant as they come. You must be an engineer. Go tell >>> John about all the aliens you talked to. >> >> Was there supposed to be a point to this disjointed babble other than >> to demonstrate you are incapable of putting together a coherent paragraph? > > I know (and anyone else familiar with science and the historical facts > knows what it's about. But you just do your senile Bert act repeating > journalist tripe and telling everybody you know science. Science and historical facts like Tesla died before lasers were invented? > All you know how to do is just rattle on with nonsense and then justify > it all by saying everone else is a "kook". Not everyone, you specifically, kook. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 02:22 -0700
Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 04:53 -0700
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-10-26 15:19 +0200
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-10-26 13:48 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 09:02 -0500
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-27 18:20 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-28 00:07 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:45 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-29 23:27 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 19:13 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-31 23:26 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 20:32 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 05:06 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 17:11 -0500
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 19:10 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-31 23:29 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 20:34 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 05:10 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 18:15 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 23:42 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-02 17:01 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-02 22:58 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-03 16:55 -0400
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-03 21:29 +0000
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-26 09:24 -0500
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 07:30 -0700
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-26 10:24 -0500
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 16:13 -0500
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 08:05 -0700
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-27 07:11 -0700
Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:58 -0700
csiph-web