Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #603532

Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics

Show all headers | View raw

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/1/2016 7:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/1/2016 1:10 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 10/31/2016 7:29 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/29/2016 6:11 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/27/2016 5:20 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/26/2016 10:02 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/26/2016 6:53 AM, john wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> I think politics has killed Physics.
>>>>>>>>>>> When Tesla died,
>>>>>>>>>>> his ideas were not shared.
>>>>>>>>>>> The US government came and
>>>>>>>>>>> confiscated them.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For what purpose?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To look them over and see if there was anything of interest to them,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And why would confiscating them and preventing them from being in public
>>>>>>>> view serve this purpose? You think the government can only benefit from
>>>>>>>> ideas if they hide them away? Why would the government have to
>>>>>>>> CONFISCATE Tesla's ideas? What would they possibly gain?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What an absolute IDIOT statement! Why the hell is so many things
>>>>>>> "clasified". Serves no purpose you say. How could government benefit
>>>>>>> form hiding technology from those who would use it against the country.
>>>>>>> And why would the government have to CONFISCATE the papers of Tesla
>>>>>>> which they couldn't get legally? I mean why would they even have an
>>>>>>> interest in the ideas of the guy who was the genius who just about
>>>>>>> invented the 20th century. I mean that makes no sense right?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> God you are as senile and ignornat as Bert. Do you live in your van and
>>>>>>> shit in a bucket?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> obviously, (especially with Tesla jammering in the newspapers about
>>>>>>>>> inventing a "death ray" to shoot down airplanes). And gosh, years later
>>>>>>>>> somehow the government has this "star wars" program to develop...wait
>>>>>>>>> for it... yeah, a "death ray" to shoot down missiles. Coincidence?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Quite possibly. Lasers didn't exist in Tesla's day but they certainly do
>>>>>>>> now. You have one in your DVD player.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Who said his "death ray" was a laser? YOu debunkers are always throwing
>>>>>>> chaff into to wind. HAve you ro HVAC ever had an honest discussion in
>>>>>>> your lives?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> PS. Have YOU ever worked on classified technology? Were YOU ever been
>>>>>>> employed on SDI developing "death rays"?  You know, there Boinker, a
>>>>>>> death ray takes a bit more brain power than it takes to make wooden toys.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As SDI was all about destroying or at least disabling unmanned stuff
>>>>>> coming from space, a "death ray" would be useless.
>>>>>
>>>>> Depends if you are "killing" people or incoming hardware. You and Odd
>>>>> are about as ignorant as they come. You must be an engineer. Go tell
>>>>> John about all the aliens you talked to.
>>>>
>>>> Was there supposed to be a point to this disjointed babble other than
>>>> to demonstrate you are incapable of putting together a coherent paragraph?
>>>
>>> I know (and anyone else familiar with science and the historical facts
>>> knows what it's about. But you just do your senile Bert act repeating
>>> journalist tripe and telling everybody you know science.
>>
>> Science and historical facts like Tesla died before lasers were invented?
> 
> You are the only one saying that I said Tesla invented a laser.

I never said that kook.

> I said no such thing.

You implied Tesla as such by bringing up SDI, which other than one
particle beam in space experiment was about lasers and more or less
conventional mass weapons. I doubt you think your hero was thinking
about advanced shotguns.

> You are nothing but the big liar Bert says you are. And 
> anyway, "Death ray" was journalist garbage (your kind of science) while 
> Tesla never said any such thing. His "SDI" "ray" was not to kill people 
> it was supposed to stop invading aircraft.

All aircraft in Tesla's time were manned.

This is just more raving babble.

You certainly do get worked up over Tesla, kook.

>>> All you know how to do is just rattle on with nonsense and then justify
>>> it all by saying everone else is a "kook".
>>
>> Not everyone, you specifically, kook.
> 
> Obviously you get to rattle on with your kooky lies and theories. Next 
> you'll be chiming in with HVAC who believes UFOs are "holograms" 
> projected by aliens!

Exactly what did I write that is a lie, kook?

As for HVAC, he certainly is excellent at pulling your strings and
making you dance.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 02:22 -0700
  Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 04:53 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-10-26 15:19 +0200
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-10-26 13:48 +0000
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 09:02 -0500
      Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-27 18:20 -0400
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-28 00:07 +0000
          Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:45 -0400
            Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-29 23:27 +0000
              Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 19:13 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-31 23:26 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 20:32 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 05:06 +0000
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 17:11 -0500
          Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 19:10 -0400
            Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-31 23:29 +0000
              Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 20:34 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 05:10 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 18:15 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 23:42 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-02 17:01 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-02 22:58 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-03 16:55 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-03 21:29 +0000
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-26 09:24 -0500
      Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 07:30 -0700
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-26 10:24 -0500
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 16:13 -0500
  Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 08:05 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-27 07:11 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:58 -0700

csiph-web