Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #603690

Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics

Show all headers | View raw

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 11/2/2016 6:58 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 11/1/2016 7:42 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 11/1/2016 1:10 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/31/2016 7:29 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/29/2016 6:11 PM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/27/2016 5:20 PM, benj wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/26/2016 10:02 AM, Odd Bodkin wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10/26/2016 6:53 AM, john wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think politics has killed Physics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> When Tesla died,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> his ideas were not shared.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The US government came and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confiscated them.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For what purpose?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To look them over and see if there was anything of interest to them,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And why would confiscating them and preventing them from being in public
>>>>>>>>>> view serve this purpose? You think the government can only benefit from
>>>>>>>>>> ideas if they hide them away? Why would the government have to
>>>>>>>>>> CONFISCATE Tesla's ideas? What would they possibly gain?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What an absolute IDIOT statement! Why the hell is so many things
>>>>>>>>> "clasified". Serves no purpose you say. How could government benefit
>>>>>>>>> form hiding technology from those who would use it against the country.
>>>>>>>>> And why would the government have to CONFISCATE the papers of Tesla
>>>>>>>>> which they couldn't get legally? I mean why would they even have an
>>>>>>>>> interest in the ideas of the guy who was the genius who just about
>>>>>>>>> invented the 20th century. I mean that makes no sense right?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> God you are as senile and ignornat as Bert. Do you live in your van and
>>>>>>>>> shit in a bucket?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> obviously, (especially with Tesla jammering in the newspapers about
>>>>>>>>>>> inventing a "death ray" to shoot down airplanes). And gosh, years later
>>>>>>>>>>> somehow the government has this "star wars" program to develop...wait
>>>>>>>>>>> for it... yeah, a "death ray" to shoot down missiles. Coincidence?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Quite possibly. Lasers didn't exist in Tesla's day but they certainly do
>>>>>>>>>> now. You have one in your DVD player.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who said his "death ray" was a laser? YOu debunkers are always throwing
>>>>>>>>> chaff into to wind. HAve you ro HVAC ever had an honest discussion in
>>>>>>>>> your lives?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> PS. Have YOU ever worked on classified technology? Were YOU ever been
>>>>>>>>> employed on SDI developing "death rays"?  You know, there Boinker, a
>>>>>>>>> death ray takes a bit more brain power than it takes to make wooden toys.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As SDI was all about destroying or at least disabling unmanned stuff
>>>>>>>> coming from space, a "death ray" would be useless.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Depends if you are "killing" people or incoming hardware. You and Odd
>>>>>>> are about as ignorant as they come. You must be an engineer. Go tell
>>>>>>> John about all the aliens you talked to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Was there supposed to be a point to this disjointed babble other than
>>>>>> to demonstrate you are incapable of putting together a coherent paragraph?
>>>>>
>>>>> I know (and anyone else familiar with science and the historical facts
>>>>> knows what it's about. But you just do your senile Bert act repeating
>>>>> journalist tripe and telling everybody you know science.
>>>>
>>>> Science and historical facts like Tesla died before lasers were invented?
>>>
>>> You are the only one saying that I said Tesla invented a laser.
>>
>> I never said that kook.
>>
>>> I said no such thing.
>>
>> You implied Tesla as such by bringing up SDI, which other than one
>> particle beam in space experiment was about lasers and more or less
>> conventional mass weapons. I doubt you think your hero was thinking
>> about advanced shotguns.
>>
>>> You are nothing but the big liar Bert says you are. And
>>> anyway, "Death ray" was journalist garbage (your kind of science) while
>>> Tesla never said any such thing. His "SDI" "ray" was not to kill people
>>> it was supposed to stop invading aircraft.
>>
>> All aircraft in Tesla's time were manned.
>>
>> This is just more raving babble.
>>
>> You certainly do get worked up over Tesla, kook.
>>
>>>>> All you know how to do is just rattle on with nonsense and then justify
>>>>> it all by saying everone else is a "kook".
>>>>
>>>> Not everyone, you specifically, kook.
>>>
>>> Obviously you get to rattle on with your kooky lies and theories. Next
>>> you'll be chiming in with HVAC who believes UFOs are "holograms"
>>> projected by aliens!
>>
>> Exactly what did I write that is a lie, kook?
>>
>> As for HVAC, he certainly is excellent at pulling your strings and
>> making you dance.
> 
> 
> We make each other dance. Dancing is fun, chimp.

Must be, you sure do a lot of it.
 

-- 
Jim Pennino

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 02:22 -0700
  Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 04:53 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-10-26 15:19 +0200
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-10-26 13:48 +0000
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 09:02 -0500
      Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-27 18:20 -0400
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-28 00:07 +0000
          Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-29 17:45 -0400
            Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-29 23:27 +0000
              Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 19:13 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-31 23:26 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 20:32 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 05:06 +0000
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-29 17:11 -0500
          Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 19:10 -0400
            Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-10-31 23:29 +0000
              Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-10-31 20:34 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 05:10 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-01 18:15 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-01 23:42 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-02 17:01 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-02 22:58 +0000
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-11-03 16:55 -0400
                Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-11-03 21:29 +0000
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-26 09:24 -0500
      Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-10-26 07:30 -0700
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Serigo <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-10-26 10:24 -0500
        Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-10-27 16:13 -0500
  Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-26 08:05 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics Pentcho Valev <pvalev@yahoo.com> - 2016-10-27 07:11 -0700
    Re: Two Falsehoods That Killed Physics jay moseley <jaymoseley@hotmail.com> - 2016-10-30 06:58 -0700

csiph-web