Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #687267

Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.checkmate
Subject Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
Date Sat, 26 May 2018 17:41:40 -0700
Lines 30
Message-ID <fmud64FpkvrU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <WJ%NC.120424$wG5.65797@fx02.iad> <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.26--1.45am.Seattle.2018> <S6fOC.13108$Kp4.9324@fx43.iad> <fmtdlmFjvnhU1@mid.individual.net> <42bjgdptesqlqekv1oc8t0vjitdgridge0@4ax.com> <fmtp30Fm421U2@mid.individual.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@May.26--4.51pm.Seattle.2018> <sgvjgdt4kd9vc0e2cmqm0k9i3rbkjmjuqt@4ax.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net uEI+Lq4hoV7gm+txI2p48gsWVRH8t58cmALtsxyb6nbO8yrS+2
Cancel-Lock sha1:CBAjWo5Wi7H2UZIga7r1lLScmE8=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0
In-Reply-To <sgvjgdt4kd9vc0e2cmqm0k9i3rbkjmjuqt@4ax.com>
Content-Language en-US
Xref csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:452517 sci.physics:687267 alt.checkmate:168427

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 5/26/18 5:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
> 
>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is
>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>>>
>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
>>
>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.
>>
>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
> 
> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is
> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact
> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For
> the same role, the pay is identical.
> 
There are mixed stats on that... but I do agree that many exaggerate the 
findings (much as you minimize them).

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
  Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
    Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
        Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
  Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:18 -0700
  Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
      Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
        Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
          Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
            Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
                They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
            Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000

csiph-web