Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #686921 > unrolled thread

Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics

Contents

  Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 09:38 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 09:47 -0700
      Michael Glasser's Marxism/Feminism. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 10:19 -0700
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-24 18:04 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:13 -0700
          Feminists suck on the BoobTube. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-24 20:28 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-24 18:28 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-24 15:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:39 -0500
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 07:55 -0500
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 09:17 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 08:57 -0500
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:13 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:15 -0500
                  Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:49 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:23 -0700
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:17 -0400
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-26 07:43 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:14 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:12 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:38 -0400
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
                          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
                            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:55 -0400
                    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 15:03 -0500
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:30 -0700
                      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 13:24 -0500
                        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 11:32 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-25 16:43 -0400
                Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 14:24 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:29 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 11:27 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 09:04 -0700
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-25 12:21 -0500
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1234@gmail.com> - 2018-05-24 20:18 -0700
    Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-25 16:12 -0400
      Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-25 18:02 -0400
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-25 15:30 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:44 -0700
        Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 01:45 -0700
          Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 11:32 -0400
            Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:43 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Bricked <bricked@barkingspiders.com> - 2018-05-26 13:51 -0500
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 11:58 -0700
                  They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-26 16:51 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 16:55 -0700
                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 20:40 -0400
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 17:41 -0700
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 21:16 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 18:30 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:35 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:36 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:39 -0500
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 10:40 -0700
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-30 15:06 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 14:50 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-31 08:29 -0500
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-31 10:02 -0700
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-30 13:29 -0700
                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-26 20:50 -0400
                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 09:05 -0400
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 06:57 -0700
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 11:44 -0400
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 12:15 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:17 -0700
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-27 12:33 -0400
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:52 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:02 -0700
                              Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-27 14:24 -0400
                                Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 08:13 -0400
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-28 09:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:51 -0500
                                  Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-28 14:49 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2018-05-28 16:14 -0400
                                    Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:29 -0500
                                      Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-29 17:40 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-29 15:01 +0200
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2018-05-30 09:14 -0400
                                        Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-30 07:57 -0500
                                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-05-30 05:59 +0200
                          Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2018-05-29 07:23 -0500
                            Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-29 07:57 -0700
              Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Ser Gregor Clegane <sergregor@lannistermail.raven> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
                Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 09:43 -0700
        Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-26 11:35 -0400
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-26 08:45 -0700
          Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-05-27 12:36 -0400
            Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Doomsdrzej <.m@nsn.s> - 2018-05-27 13:54 -0400
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-27 11:01 -0700
              Re: Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2018-05-31 21:34 +0000

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

#687115

On 5/25/18 3:02 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>
>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>
>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>
>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>   but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>
>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>
>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>
> As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been 
> sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and 
> sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African 
> badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. 
> Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black 
> Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the 
> party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think 
> that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with 
> our own eyes.

Why tell such lies? What do you benefit from that?

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687354

On Fri, 25 May 2018 15:30:44 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>On 5/25/18 3:02 PM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>>
>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>>
>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>>   but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>>
>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>
>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>>
>> As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been 
>> sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and 
>> sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African 
>> badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days. 
>> Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black 
>> Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the 
>> party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think 
>> that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with 
>> our own eyes.
>
>Why tell such lies? What do you benefit from that?

The only potential lie I see is one of omission as Benj
forgot to mention strident liberal racial indoctrination 
that aborting black babies is something about which to 
be proud.

-- 

Yours Truly,
Gregory Hall

"Tsk, tsk. No one appreciates his brilliance, poor fellow. 
(There might be a message in that for him.)"--Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries

http://apprhondaleahkirkfries.blogspot.com/2014/05/rhonda-leah-kirk-fries-interview.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687360

On 5/27/18 9:36 AM, Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq. wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 15:30:44 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 5/25/18 3:02 PM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/25/2018 4:12 PM, Ser Gregor Clegane wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:38:52 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, Jack Ma, the top earners, are men.
>>>>>
>>>>> SovietTards ( Nepal, Cuba, Venezuela and North Korea )
>>>>> solve this disparity by giving everyone the same wage;
>>>>> and, as an added benefit, they get a stone age aesthetic
>>>>> that's easy on the environment, Al Gore style.
>>>>>
>>>>> Western Feminists point to BlueEyed Norway as their ideal;
>>>>> and they project their _extreme_ racism onto others.
>>>>> " I aint saying she's a gold digger,
>>>>>    but she aint messing with no broke nigger. " -- Kanye West
>>>>>
>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>>
>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>>>
>>> As you well know, the (ahem) American community of color has long been
>>> sold the idea by liberals that single parenthood for mothers and
>>> sperm-donor and then off to a life of crime for fathers is the African
>>> badge of honor. Libs have been selling this agenda since slave days.
>>> Destroy the black families, destroy the black churches, and scare Black
>>> Americans into thinking they are Africans and into voting against the
>>> party of abolition and voting for the party of Jim Crow. You'd think
>>> that this sales pitch had no legs if we had not all seen it working with
>>> our own eyes.
>>
>> Why tell such lies? What do you benefit from that?
> 
> The only potential lie I see is one of omission as Benj
> forgot to mention strident liberal racial indoctrination
> that aborting black babies is something about which to
> be proud.
> 
OK, so you fail to see obvious things. Fair enough.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687162 — Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

> > > Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
> > > "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
> > 
> > Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?

    Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
    And marriage is about kids.

> [ get her pregnant ] then off to a life of crime

    War, drugs and crime are about sex and procreation, mostly.

    Karl Marx fathered 8 children, 7 with his wife.

    And what is Islam about, if not sex and procreation ?

> the African badge of honor. 

    It's _your_ downfall too, not just theirs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687177 — Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

On 5/26/2018 4:45 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>
>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
> 
>      Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>      And marriage is about kids.
> 
>> [ get her pregnant ] then off to a life of crime
> 
>      War, drugs and crime are about sex and procreation, mostly.
> 
>      Karl Marx fathered 8 children, 7 with his wife.
> 
>      And what is Islam about, if not sex and procreation ?
> 
>> the African badge of honor.
> 
>      It's _your_ downfall too, not just theirs.
> 
Yes, that is the unfortunate side effect of listening to lefty libs.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687184 — Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

On 5/26/18 8:32 AM, benj wrote:
> On 5/26/2018 4:45 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and 
>>>>> unfortunate.
>>>>
>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>
>>      Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>      And marriage is about kids.
>>
>>> [ get her pregnant ] then off to a life of crime
>>
>>      War, drugs and crime are about sex and procreation, mostly.
>>
>>      Karl Marx fathered 8 children, 7 with his wife.
>>
>>      And what is Islam about, if not sex and procreation ?
>>
>>> the African badge of honor.
>>
>>      It's _your_ downfall too, not just theirs.
>>
> Yes, that is the unfortunate side effect of listening to lefty libs.

Keep in mind most of America backs much of the liberal platform. They 
want to reduce income redistribution to the rich, they want to push 
toward greener energy, they want a living wage, they want health care 
for all, etc.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687201 — Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

On Sat, 26 May 2018 08:43:50 -0700, Snit
<usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:

>On 5/26/18 8:32 AM, benj wrote:
>> On 5/26/2018 4:45 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and 
>>>>>> unfortunate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>>
>>>      Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>      And marriage is about kids.
>>>
>>>> [ get her pregnant ] then off to a life of crime
>>>
>>>      War, drugs and crime are about sex and procreation, mostly.
>>>
>>>      Karl Marx fathered 8 children, 7 with his wife.
>>>
>>>      And what is Islam about, if not sex and procreation ?
>>>
>>>> the African badge of honor.
>>>
>>>      It's _your_ downfall too, not just theirs.
>>>
>> Yes, that is the unfortunate side effect of listening to lefty libs.
>
>Keep in mind most of America backs much of the liberal platform. They 
>want to reduce income redistribution to the rich, they want to push 
>toward greener energy, they want a living wage, they want health care 
>for all, etc.

 They 
>want to reduce income redistribution to the rich??  

Are you saying somehow that the guv is forcing poor folks to pay up to
the rich?  

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687202 — Re: Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.

On 5/26/18 11:51 AM, Bricked wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 08:43:50 -0700, Snit
> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 5/26/18 8:32 AM, benj wrote:
>>> On 5/26/2018 4:45 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>>>>> Who breeds more ? poor Muslims or rich Japanese ?
>>>>>>> "Marriage & Kids" is the domain of the poor, uneducated and
>>>>>>> unfortunate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since when are American niggers getting married in droves?
>>>>
>>>>       Kids are the domain of the poor, uneducated and unfortunate.
>>>>       And marriage is about kids.
>>>>
>>>>> [ get her pregnant ] then off to a life of crime
>>>>
>>>>       War, drugs and crime are about sex and procreation, mostly.
>>>>
>>>>       Karl Marx fathered 8 children, 7 with his wife.
>>>>
>>>>       And what is Islam about, if not sex and procreation ?
>>>>
>>>>> the African badge of honor.
>>>>
>>>>       It's _your_ downfall too, not just theirs.
>>>>
>>> Yes, that is the unfortunate side effect of listening to lefty libs.
>>
>> Keep in mind most of America backs much of the liberal platform. They
>> want to reduce income redistribution to the rich, they want to push
>> toward greener energy, they want a living wage, they want health care
>> for all, etc.
> 
>   They
>> want to reduce income redistribution to the rich??
> 
> Are you saying somehow that the guv is forcing poor folks to pay up to
> the rich?
> 
In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687263 — They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

> > > [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
> > 
> > Are you saying somehow that the guv is 
> > forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
> 
> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.

Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.

They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687264 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/26/18 4:51 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>>>
>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is
>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>>
>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
> 
> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.

Before I thought you meant me... but clearly not. Who are you even 
talking about?

> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Who?



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687266 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:

>> > > [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>> > 
>> > Are you saying somehow that the guv is 
>> > forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>> 
>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
>
>Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.
>
>They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is
lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact
that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For
the same role, the pay is identical.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687267 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/26/18 5:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
> 
>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>>>>
>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is
>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>>>
>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
>>
>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.
>>
>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
> 
> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is
> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact
> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For
> the same role, the pay is identical.
> 
There are mixed stats on that... but I do agree that many exaggerate the 
findings (much as you minimize them).

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687270 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/26/2018 8:41 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/26/18 5:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>
>>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is
>>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>>>>
>>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
>>>
>>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.
>>>
>>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
>>
>> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is
>> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact
>> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For
>> the same role, the pay is identical.
>>
> There are mixed stats on that... but I do agree that many exaggerate the 
> findings (much as you minimize them).
> 
In jobs where actual work is done there is little of this kind of unfair 
treatment of women, People trying to accomplish things don't care if you 
are young, old, male, female, third sex, built upside down or whatever, 
so long as you are getting the work done.

Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so they 
are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually 
covers their crimes quite nicely.

I recall a certain university Chemistry department which had the 
unwritten policy that women professors never got tenure. They'd hire 
women profs and extract as much work as they could out of them and then 
when tenure time came the (male) faculty committee would ding them and 
sent them on their way. And they'd hire some more. Worked Great they 
could point to how many women were on the faculty and how hard they were 
fighting for women while behind the scenes the old boy network was 
giving them the shaft. (EW not not literally, all chemists are MUCH to 
stinky for that to be an option!)

Another (which should be no surprise) was this high level meeting our 
organization had with Japanese VIPS. Of course a number of OUR 
departments heads were women. And in the meeting all the Japanese (all 
men) would just totally ignore anything said by the women. They would 
only discuss it if the ideas were repeated by the men there. Fucking 
amazing even by my misogynist standards.

Hey "kensi"!

Got Tenure?

<Snicker>  (Rule #5)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687272 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/26/18 6:16 PM, benj wrote:
> On 5/26/2018 8:41 PM, Snit wrote:
>> On 5/26/18 5:40 PM, Doomsdrzej wrote:
>>> On Sat, 26 May 2018 16:51:48 -0700 (Seattle), Jeff-Relf.Me  @. wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> [ Hillary would ] reduce income redistribution to the rich
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you saying somehow that the guv is
>>>>>> forcing poor folks to pay up to the rich?
>>>>>
>>>>> In direct and indirect ways... absolutely.
>>>>
>>>> Hillary and Mike hate men because they earn more, generally.
>>>>
>>>> They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.
>>>
>>> Men don't earn more and those "statistics" showing that women's pay is
>>> lower is complete and utter crap because they don't factor in the fact
>>> that women generally work fewer hours and and take more time off. For
>>> the same role, the pay is identical.
>>>
>> There are mixed stats on that... but I do agree that many exaggerate 
>> the findings (much as you minimize them).
>>
> In jobs where actual work is done there is little of this kind of unfair 
> treatment of women, People trying to accomplish things don't care if you 
> are young, old, male, female, third sex, built upside down or whatever, 
> so long as you are getting the work done.

Would love to see your support of this!

> Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so they 
> are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually 
> covers their crimes quite nicely.

Ah, you are just trolling. Got it.

> I recall a certain university Chemistry department which had the 
> unwritten policy that women professors never got tenure. They'd hire 
> women profs and extract as much work as they could out of them and then 
> when tenure time came the (male) faculty committee would ding them and 
> sent them on their way. 

Which completely contradicts your claim about women not being treated 
less well.

> And they'd hire some more. Worked Great they 
> could point to how many women were on the faculty and how hard they were 
> fighting for women while behind the scenes the old boy network was 
> giving them the shaft. (EW not not literally, all chemists are MUCH to 
> stinky for that to be an option!)
> 
> Another (which should be no surprise) was this high level meeting our 
> organization had with Japanese VIPS. Of course a number of OUR 
> departments heads were women. And in the meeting all the Japanese (all 
> men) would just totally ignore anything said by the women. They would 
> only discuss it if the ideas were repeated by the men there. Fucking 
> amazing even by my misogynist standards.

So again shooting down your own claim. OK.

> Hey "kensi"!
> 
> Got Tenure?
> 
> <Snicker>  (Rule #5)
> 
> 


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687630 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

benj wrote:

>Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so they 
>are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually 
>covers their crimes quite nicely.

Jeezez, you are filthy.  "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh?

Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying?

You need not respond.  I won't read it.  I know that you will just
lie.

> (further lies snipped, unread)

-- 
"It is not that you think I am a liar -- you are not stupid enough to
really think that --  you just hate the fact I am honest."  -  some
thing, lying shamelessly (but no one can quote it lying)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687730 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

chrisv wrote this copyrighted missive and expects royalties:

> benj wrote:
>
>>Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so they 
>>are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually 
>>covers their crimes quite nicely.
>
> Jeezez, you are filthy.  "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh?
>
> Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying?
>
> You need not respond.  I won't read it.  I know that you will just
> lie.
>
>> (further lies snipped, unread)

"benj" is a total dolt or a programmed bot.  You decide which.

-- 
You love your home and want it to be beautiful.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687796 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

Chris Ahlstrom wrote:

> chrisv wrote:
>>
>> benj wrote:
>>>
>>>Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so they 
>>>are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually 
>>>covers their crimes quite nicely.
>>
>> Jeezez, you are filthy.  "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh?
>>
>> Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying?
>>
>> You need not respond.  I won't read it.  I know that you will just
>> lie.
>>
>>> (further lies snipped, unread)
>
> "benj" is a total dolt or a programmed bot.  You decide which.

Total dolt.  Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would
that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"?

You just don't see that kind of shameless lying, and brain-dead
illogic, from the left.  It seems to always come from the right,
especially the lies.

Their favorite attack is "You're a leftist because you're poor and
want to leach off those who work!"  Note the obvious parallels to the
Wintrolls' attacks against Free software advocates.

-- 
"(cola is) attacked because it's a cess pit of second hand news,
paranoia and anti-MS lunacy by a bunch of know nothing, contribute
nothing clueless freetards."    -  "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687822 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/30/18 5:39 AM, chrisv wrote:
> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
> 
>> chrisv wrote:
>>>
>>> benj wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so they
>>>> are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually
>>>> covers their crimes quite nicely.
>>>
>>> Jeezez, you are filthy.  "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh?
>>>
>>> Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying?
>>>
>>> You need not respond.  I won't read it.  I know that you will just
>>> lie.
>>>
>>>> (further lies snipped, unread)
>>
>> "benj" is a total dolt or a programmed bot.  You decide which.
> 
> Total dolt.  Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would
> that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"?
> 
> You just don't see that kind of shameless lying, and brain-dead
> illogic, from the left.  It seems to always come from the right,
> especially the lies.
> 
> Their favorite attack is "You're a leftist because you're poor and
> want to leach off those who work!"  Note the obvious parallels to the
> Wintrolls' attacks against Free software advocates.
> 
There are plenty of "advocates" who push bigotry (just as there are 
plenty who push back against it).

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687834 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

On 5/30/2018 1:40 PM, Snit wrote:
> On 5/30/18 5:39 AM, chrisv wrote:
>> Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>>
>>> chrisv wrote:
>>>>
>>>> benj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Libs on the other hand never have those kind of productive jobs so 
>>>>> they
>>>>> are far more prone to racism and sexism though their bullshit usually
>>>>> covers their crimes quite nicely.
>>>>
>>>> Jeezez, you are filthy.  "Libs" never have productive jobs, eh?
>>>>
>>>> Who do you hope to fool, which such obvious lying?
>>>>
>>>> You need not respond.  I won't read it.  I know that you will just
>>>> lie.
>>>>
>>>>> (further lies snipped, unread)
>>>
>>> "benj" is a total dolt or a programmed bot.  You decide which.
>>
>> Total dolt.  Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would
>> that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"?

Start with name calling, that's always an ethical and honest debate on 
the left, right? When you don't do anything productive and rely on your 
"wits" (read bullshit) to get what you have, then you must use any trick 
in the book to 'sell" your product. It's one of the rules of acquisition 
that bullshit always has the highest mark-up.

>> You just don't see that kind of shameless lying, and brain-dead
>> illogic, from the left.  It seems to always come from the right,
>> especially the lies.

Standrd Left. They fantasy left ALWAYS accuses anyone who points out 
their methods of using the very methods that they employ. A careful 
examination of left statements vs those on the right show that the right 
values honesty and integrity while the left mostly appreciates clever 
lies and propaganda.

>> Their favorite attack is "You're a leftist because you're poor and
>> want to leach off those who work!"  Note the obvious parallels to the
>> Wintrolls' attacks against Free software advocates.

bullshit. Free software is given away by the people who created it. 
(which is fine and a worthy contribution to human civilization) while 
lefty libs like to steal what OTHER PEOPLE have created because 1. 
Fantasy is the ONLY thing they have the ability to create. and 2. They 
consider themselves smarter than everyone else hence better suited to 
determine the best way the money of other people should be distributed.
Simple as that.

> There are plenty of "advocates" who push bigotry (just as there are 
> plenty who push back against it).

And then there is the left who PRETEND to push back against it while 
cleverly hiding their own agenda of racism and bigotry. just ask Bill 
Cosby what happens to you when you start pushing back against lib double 
secret racism and bigotry.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#687850 — Re: They'd tax your penis, if they weren't so busy taxing your breath.

benj wrote:

>>> Total dolt.  Even if "libs" didn't have productive jobs, why would
>>> that make them "far more prone to racism and sexism"?
>
>Start with name calling, that's always an ethical and honest debate on 
>the left, right? 

But it's you who started, with the idiotic, dishonest, attacks,
"benj".  You've got no right to whine that you've been called a "dolt"
in response.

>When you don't do anything productive 

But many "libs" are productive, "benj", making your claim, that "libs"
never do anything productive, a lie.

> and rely on your  (remaining gibberish snipped, unread)

No one denies that idleness and dependance are "bad", "benj", but no
amount of propaganda will convince me that it makes people "far more
prone to racism and sexism".  It's absurd, made-up nonsense.

Idiot.

-- 
'(Linux is) designed for a "community"?????????????????????
Hahahahha.  Whats that? A group of people who dont want to buy
anything????'  -  "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 3 of 5 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics

csiph-web