Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #684828

Re: Perfection is the enemy of the LeastBad.

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 5/10/18 2:51 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
> Michael replied ( to me ):
>>> Steve looks for humility in you two, Michael and Fabian,
>>> knowing he won't find it; he gets off on it, somehow.
>>
>> Carroll seeks to demonize me and blame me for all of his troubles,
>> including his divorce.
> 
> You insult him to you absolve yourself, proving my point.

I noted facts about him. I also own my mistakes. When he nit picked some 
wording of mine, for example, I owned my error.

>>> It's not just blacks, it's males too, the poor and crazy.
>>> Profiling is bad, just as giving away needles is bad,
>>> but it's better than the alternative ( dead cops, dead junkies ).
>>
>> If we are going to do that, will you at least be consistent and accept
>> profiling in affirmative action?  If you are going to assume color
>> represents danger the it also represents lack of opportunity and we
>> should balance that with quotas.  Personally I reject both.
> 
> Perfection is the enemy of the LeastBad.
> Dead Cops and Dead Junkies are one thing;
> "equal outcomes", regardless of talent, Soviet style, is another.
> 
> When the BrownEyed do it, in North Korea and Nepal, SovietTards say it's wrong;
> when BlueEyed Norway does it, SovietTards say it's the greatest.

To me they are the same: if you are going to judge by color than be 
consistent. I reject doing so.

>>>> * You showed deep ignorance about the weaknesses of using
>>>> a single test to judge the qualifications of an individual.
>>>
>>> Again, it's the LeastBad option.
>>> Hold your nose, Go for it.
>>
>> Why is it the least bad option?
> 
> Because neither "they" ( the best schools ) nor you,
> have come up with anything less bad ( e.g. CryptoCurrency grading ).

I mean merely what Carroll quoted: using grades and the like. Anyone can 
have a bad day, and a great student can be a poor tester (and a poor 
student a great tester).

I happen to be a very good tester... but I know that does not mean I am 
better qualified than some poor testers.

>>>> * you insisted Politfact has a bias    but failed to show it
>>>
>>> They promote premises that are useful to their tribe;
>>> compared to this, truthiness simply doesn't matter.
>>
>> They may be biased... but he has yet to show it.
> 
> They're BlueEyed SovietTards, no BrownEyes need apply;
> they project their (subconscious) racism onto others.
> 
> Like Steve, I feel no need to prove this to anyone;
> likewise, I feel no need to debate FlatEarthers.

I have no issue with you not supporting your views... just do not expect 
me to agree with unsupported views. I am very much tied to evidence and 
support, science and data.



-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They 
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel 
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Maurice Clemmons isn't a 90 year old Japanese lady. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-10 14:03 -0700
  Re: Maurice Clemmons isn't a 90 year old Japanese lady. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 14:18 -0700
    Perfection is the enemy of the LeastBad. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2018-05-10 14:51 -0700
      Re: Perfection is the enemy of the LeastBad. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2018-05-10 15:02 -0700

csiph-web