Groups > sci.physics > #519547

Re: Rocky's imagined nukes

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Rocky's imagined nukes
Date	Mon, 7 Sep 2015 15:14:56 -0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	15
Sender	Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID	<f8m0cc-gva.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<1ckjta513j3ih5ijdv9l5dnq6sq3ql9ph8@4ax.com> <X4-dne9otPq7S0TInZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrcu9r$squ$2@dont-email.me> <P76dnal9k4MwiUfInZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrdaj7$hn4$3@dont-email.me> <W_Kdna8vXd4f3XDInZ2dnUU7-fOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="30831"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ZUscrTpA2x0CZ7416yNiC"
User-Agent	tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock	sha1:1/dVAi9YLymu4OYkA2etpgkKg6E=
Xref	csiph.com alt.astronomy:275201 alt.conspiracy:266621 sci.physics:519547

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:

> BTW incase you missed it the way excess radiation from GZ went undetected 
> was they sent samples to another area completely and they probably sat for a 
> long enough time that any excess radiation decreased in amount before the 
> samples were actually looked at.

You mean like a few thousand years, you ignorant, babbling kook?

If nukes had been used in New York, the radiation levels would still
be higher today and for a very long time, ignorant kook.

-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:17 -0500
  Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
    Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:46 -0500
      Re: Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:53 +0000
        Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:12 -0500
          Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:18 -0500
            Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:11 -0500
      Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
        Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 02:47 -0500
          Re: Rocky's imagined nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 15:14 +0000
          Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
      Re: Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:33 -0700
        2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:53 -0500
          Re: 2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:32 -0700
            Re: 2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:59 -0500
              depleted uranium (u-238 ... or U235? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:18 -0700
          Re: 2 je suis charly Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
          Re: 2 je suis charly gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:14 -0500
  Re: Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:18 +0000
    Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:19 -0500
      Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:47 +0100
        Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:15 -0500
          Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:51 +0100
    Re: Nukes collapse videos could be all bogus "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:00 -0500
      Re: Nukes collapse videos could be all bogus "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:01 -0500
      Re: Nukes collapse videos could be all bogus noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:21 -0700
  Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:37 -0500
    Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:21 -0500
      Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:18 -0500
        Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:17 -0500
          Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 20:12 -0500
            Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:11 -0500
              Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-07 19:00 -0500
              Re: Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:41 -0500
                Re: Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:53 -0500

csiph-web