Re: Nukes

From	"Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
References	<1ckjta513j3ih5ijdv9l5dnq6sq3ql9ph8@4ax.com> <X4-dne9otPq7S0TInZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrcu9r$squ$2@dont-email.me>
Subject	Re: Nukes
Date	2015-08-23 13:46 -0500
Message-ID	<P76dnal9k4MwiUfInZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message 
news:mrcu9r$squ$2@dont-email.me...
> On 23/08/2015 15:17, Rocky wrote:
>> "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1ckjta513j3ih5ijdv9l5dnq6sq3ql9ph8@4ax.com...
>>> Why is Israel's Nuclear Arsenal Not Mentioned in Iran Deal Debate?
>>> McClatchy
>>> http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article31470917.html
>>>
>>> There's one major issue that President Barack Obama, his supporters
>>> and his critics assiduously have avoided as they battle over the deal
>>> designed to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons: Israel's own
>>> nuclear arsenal. An open secret for decades, the Israeli stockpile is
>>> estimated at some 80-100 warheads, though Israel refuses to confirm or
>>> deny its existence under a policy of deliberate ambiguity ... Yet as
>>> the sides joust over the Iran deal's impact on Israel's security,
>>> Obama has been silent on the Israeli arsenal as a potential deterrent
>>> against Iranian cheating on the accord ... To some experts, the fierce
>>> debate over whether the Iran deal endangers Israel or makes it safer
>>> will be incomplete and misleading as long as it skirts the Middle
>>> East's only nuclear arms stockpile.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO because you are forgetting one thing.  Israel could be 
>> blackmailing
>> us.  Israel could be telling Obama if he mentions their nukes they will
>> prove the Twin Towers were nuked.
>
> Could be, could be??

Of course.  You have seen the remains of Ground Zero and if you watched the 
following video you would know why those remains support two NCDs.

Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I

>> And the following photo is a good start because even NIST could not 
>> explain
>> how a collapse initiation could lead to something that looks more like a
>> nuclear detonation or two than (NIST words) "a Global Collapse."
>>   http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>
>
> What nuclear detonation are you comparing it to?

Look at you, you can't prove it was a collapse or a CD and Judy Wood could 
not prove it was a DEW so Dimitri Khalezov easily wins with the following 
video because he was the only person to address what was left on the ground 
at Ground Zero and why it was called Ground Zero.  <G>

Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I


>> Oh, and I just saw this too:
>>
>> NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence: Step 1
>>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs

Oddly enough it is SOP for you to skip over evidence that proves not only 
did the media lie to us but so did NIST.

Rocky

Thread

Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:17 -0500
  Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
    Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:46 -0500
      Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
        Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 02:47 -0500
          Re: Rocky's imagined nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 15:14 +0000
          Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
      Re: Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:33 -0700
        2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:53 -0500
          Re: 2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:32 -0700
            Re: 2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:59 -0500
          Re: 2 je suis charly Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
          Re: 2 je suis charly gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:14 -0500
  Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:37 -0500
    Re: Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:41 -0500
      Re: Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:53 -0500
  Re: Nukes collapse videos could be all bogus "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:00 -0500

csiph-web