Re: Nukes

From	Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
Subject	Re: Nukes
Date	2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mrdaj7$hn4$3@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<1ckjta513j3ih5ijdv9l5dnq6sq3ql9ph8@4ax.com> <X4-dne9otPq7S0TInZ2dnUU7-TudnZ2d@giganews.com> <mrcu9r$squ$2@dont-email.me> <P76dnal9k4MwiUfInZ2dnUU7-e2dnZ2d@giganews.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 23/08/2015 19:46, Rocky wrote:
> "Tony Dragon" <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:mrcu9r$squ$2@dont-email.me...
>> On 23/08/2015 15:17, Rocky wrote:
>>> "Topaz" <mars1933@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1ckjta513j3ih5ijdv9l5dnq6sq3ql9ph8@4ax.com...
>>>> Why is Israel's Nuclear Arsenal Not Mentioned in Iran Deal Debate?
>>>> McClatchy
>>>> http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article31470917.html
>>>>
>>>> There's one major issue that President Barack Obama, his supporters
>>>> and his critics assiduously have avoided as they battle over the deal
>>>> designed to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons: Israel's own
>>>> nuclear arsenal. An open secret for decades, the Israeli stockpile is
>>>> estimated at some 80-100 warheads, though Israel refuses to confirm or
>>>> deny its existence under a policy of deliberate ambiguity ... Yet as
>>>> the sides joust over the Iran deal's impact on Israel's security,
>>>> Obama has been silent on the Israeli arsenal as a potential deterrent
>>>> against Iranian cheating on the accord ... To some experts, the fierce
>>>> debate over whether the Iran deal endangers Israel or makes it safer
>>>> will be incomplete and misleading as long as it skirts the Middle
>>>> East's only nuclear arms stockpile.
>>>
>>> ROTFLMAO because you are forgetting one thing.  Israel could be
>>> blackmailing
>>> us.  Israel could be telling Obama if he mentions their nukes they will
>>> prove the Twin Towers were nuked.
>>
>> Could be, could be??
>
> Of course.  You have seen the remains of Ground Zero and if you watched the
> following video you would know why those remains support two NCDs.
>
> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I
>
>>> And the following photo is a good start because even NIST could not
>>> explain
>>> how a collapse initiation could lead to something that looks more like a
>>> nuclear detonation or two than (NIST words) "a Global Collapse."
>>>    http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>>>
>>
>> What nuclear detonation are you comparing it to?
>
> Look at you, you can't prove it was a collapse or a CD

Why would I want to prove it was a CD?

> and Judy Wood could
> not prove it was a DEW so Dimitri Khalezov easily wins with the following
> video because he was the only person to address what was left on the ground
> at Ground Zero and why it was called Ground Zero.  <G>
>

So no answer then.

> Dimitri Khalezov - WTC Nuclear Demolition [Complete / Full Length]
>   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lec9giab90I
>
>
>>> Oh, and I just saw this too:
>>>
>>> NIST's Questionable Collapse Initiation Sequence: Step 1
>>>    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvCuMULutHs
>
> Oddly enough it is SOP for you to skip over evidence that proves not only
> did the media lie to us but so did NIST.
>
> Rocky sheeple
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

Thread

Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 09:17 -0500
  Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 18:03 +0100
    Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 13:46 -0500
      Re: Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 18:53 +0000
        Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:12 -0500
          Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:18 -0500
            Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:11 -0500
      Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 21:33 +0100
        Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse ) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 02:47 -0500
          Re: Rocky's imagined nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-07 15:14 +0000
          Re: Nukes ( Tony has no proof of a collapse ) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-09-07 18:46 +0100
      Re: Nukes je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 13:33 -0700
        2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 15:53 -0500
          Re: 2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) je suis charly <charlie-gordon1492@no.where> - 2015-08-23 14:32 -0700
            Re: 2 je suis charly (was: Nukes) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-23 16:59 -0500
              depleted uranium (u-238 ... or U235? noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 14:18 -0700
          Re: 2 je suis charly Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-23 23:16 +0100
          Re: 2 je suis charly gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:14 -0500
  Re: Nukes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-23 17:18 +0000
    Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:19 -0500
      Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-24 23:47 +0100
        Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:15 -0500
          Re: Nukes Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-25 23:51 +0100
    Re: Nukes collapse videos could be all bogus "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-24 17:00 -0500
      Re: Nukes collapse videos could be all bogus "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 20:01 -0500
      Re: Nukes collapse videos could be all bogus noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-08-24 19:21 -0700
  Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-23 15:37 -0500
    Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-24 16:21 -0500
      Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-24 20:18 -0500
        Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-25 17:17 -0500
          Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-25 20:12 -0500
            Re: Re: Nukes Topaz <mars1933@hotmail.com> - 2015-08-26 04:11 -0500
              Re: Nukes gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-09-07 19:00 -0500
              Re: Re: Nukes "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 19:41 -0500
                Re: Nukes "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-09-08 03:53 -0500

csiph-web