Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #633776
| Path | csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace |
| Date | Fri, 19 May 2017 20:26:53 +1000 |
| Lines | 27 |
| Message-ID | <eo7vjgFgfraU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <35a17afd-b373-4d2f-b6ef-5996c132fa84@googlegroups.com> <em29mfFto2uU1@mid.individual.net> <2d90e4c8-5539-455b-b51f-59c94e8bfe5c@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | individual.net 2nCILv78P6WTY7yHBhlQXACNqG6SSqFPiXKb6sbYChQ3SZYA+x |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:P5tnJrh6BXc04a2xZm6W4Bbyxk0= |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <2d90e4c8-5539-455b-b51f-59c94e8bfe5c@googlegroups.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:633776 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 19/05/2017 3:08 PM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote: > On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 5:39:54 AM UTC+5:30, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 21/04/2017 12:41 AM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote: >>> >>> The video shows only compression half cycle. In this half cycle, >>> upper side body (A) remains stationary while second body (B) of equal >>> mass moves towards it. In expansion half cycle, second body (B) >>> remains stationary while upper side body (A) moves away from it. Thus >>> at the end of one complete cycle, we find that the whole device >>> (including two bodies) are displaced in space without expelling any >>> reaction mass. >> >> It is clear from the video that the upper side does not stay stationary, >> so what's the point of posting this nonsense? >> >> Sylvia. > > It almost stays stationary. It moves because of weight difference in the connecting rods. > > Now I have built new device and I am using right-left threaded bolt to control the motion of both weights. You can see in this video that "upper side" weight does not move from its place. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el8aduO_1eM > There's plenty of friction around. This video shows nothing of significance. Sylvia
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-04-23 10:09 +1000
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-18 22:08 -0700
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-19 20:26 +1000
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 07:01 -0700
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-19 11:56 -0500
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:12 -0700
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 13:19 -0500
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 22:43 -0700
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-07-03 22:57 -0700
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-20 11:42 +1000
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 07:20 -0700
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-21 10:03 +1000
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 21:51 -0400
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2017-05-21 11:54 +1000
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2017-05-20 22:23 -0400
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace AbhiJeet Patil <abhiriksh@gmail.com> - 2017-05-21 05:31 -0700
Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Serg io <invalid@invalid.com> - 2017-05-21 09:47 -0500
csiph-web