Path: csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics Subject: Re: Reactionless Action Mechanism for Aerospace Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 20:26:53 +1000 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <35a17afd-b373-4d2f-b6ef-5996c132fa84@googlegroups.com> <2d90e4c8-5539-455b-b51f-59c94e8bfe5c@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net 2nCILv78P6WTY7yHBhlQXACNqG6SSqFPiXKb6sbYChQ3SZYA+x Cancel-Lock: sha1:P5tnJrh6BXc04a2xZm6W4Bbyxk0= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: <2d90e4c8-5539-455b-b51f-59c94e8bfe5c@googlegroups.com> Xref: csiph.com sci.physics:633776 On 19/05/2017 3:08 PM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote: > On Sunday, April 23, 2017 at 5:39:54 AM UTC+5:30, Sylvia Else wrote: >> On 21/04/2017 12:41 AM, AbhiJeet Patil wrote: >>> >>> The video shows only compression half cycle. In this half cycle, >>> upper side body (A) remains stationary while second body (B) of equal >>> mass moves towards it. In expansion half cycle, second body (B) >>> remains stationary while upper side body (A) moves away from it. Thus >>> at the end of one complete cycle, we find that the whole device >>> (including two bodies) are displaced in space without expelling any >>> reaction mass. >> >> It is clear from the video that the upper side does not stay stationary, >> so what's the point of posting this nonsense? >> >> Sylvia. > > It almost stays stationary. It moves because of weight difference in the connecting rods. > > Now I have built new device and I am using right-left threaded bolt to control the motion of both weights. You can see in this video that "upper side" weight does not move from its place. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el8aduO_1eM > There's plenty of friction around. This video shows nothing of significance. Sylvia