Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #593771
| From | Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: QM and GR. |
| Date | 2016-08-19 13:05 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <e1nbb9FbsftU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <nm0dtm$5sb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <dutv5vFo4jqU1@mid.individual.net> <nmtgg6$jb7$2@gioia.aioe.org> <dvlbcsFbs1pU1@mid.individual.net> <nngdvq$nj8$2@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 30/07/2016 6:23 AM, Tsvetana Kasatkina wrote: > Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 23/07/2016 2:09 AM, Greg Buttler wrote: >>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>> >>>> There cannot be two different correct theories, because if they're >>>> different, they'll sometimes give different answers, and at least one >>>> would have to be wrong. >>> >>> I'm not sure it works like that. You may easily have to distinct >>> theories predicting same outcome. However, the discussion is not about >>> it, but combining all existing theories into a single one. There is no >>> need for that. >> >> If you have two separate theories that address disjoint aspects of >> physics - that is, there are no areas of physics that both theories >> address - then you can trivially put them together to form a single >> theory. > > You may want to rephrase this total nonsense. > No, I stand by it in its original form. Perhaps you just don't understand it. Sylvia.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: QM and GR. Greg Buttler <grgb@novotnysite.org> - 2016-07-22 16:09 +0000
Re: QM and GR. edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-07-24 17:19 -0700
Re: QM and GR. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-25 12:21 +1000
Re: QM and GR. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-25 11:06 -0700
Re: QM and GR. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-07-26 13:00 +1000
Re: QM and GR. "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-07-27 09:44 -0700
Re: QM and GR. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-07-27 12:51 -0700
Re: QM and GR. Tsvetana Kasatkina <tzve@noemail.info> - 2016-07-29 20:23 +0000
Re: QM and GR. noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-07-31 19:05 -0700
Re: QM and GR. Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-08-19 13:05 +1000
csiph-web