Path: csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Sylvia Else Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics Subject: Re: QM and GR. Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 13:05:13 +1000 Lines: 28 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net b+7fl9AKoHrVkH2T1p4Tow1qtMtab0zNuO5+908sn4FouDN8X8 Cancel-Lock: sha1:NBkBhzodxEyYHEEau4mOdM11qiw= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 In-Reply-To: Xref: csiph.com sci.physics.relativity:390329 sci.physics:593771 On 30/07/2016 6:23 AM, Tsvetana Kasatkina wrote: > Sylvia Else wrote: > >> On 23/07/2016 2:09 AM, Greg Buttler wrote: >>> Sylvia Else wrote: >>> >>>> There cannot be two different correct theories, because if they're >>>> different, they'll sometimes give different answers, and at least one >>>> would have to be wrong. >>> >>> I'm not sure it works like that. You may easily have to distinct >>> theories predicting same outcome. However, the discussion is not about >>> it, but combining all existing theories into a single one. There is no >>> need for that. >> >> If you have two separate theories that address disjoint aspects of >> physics - that is, there are no areas of physics that both theories >> address - then you can trivially put them together to form a single >> theory. > > You may want to rephrase this total nonsense. > No, I stand by it in its original form. Perhaps you just don't understand it. Sylvia.