Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #547406

Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science --

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science --
Date Sat, 23 Jan 2016 16:34:05 +1100
Lines 20
Message-ID <dgghmdFebdqU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <d3818c2b-500c-4b83-9e58-b53343b313b0@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net zUBuxYVdf21o1Hef7LRm3QxvZU6I7YW/DWEWJFz3noE5qLfNZ0
Cancel-Lock sha1:MQBz2eaYg33t9AwEcGzm8TXIol0=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
In-Reply-To <d3818c2b-500c-4b83-9e58-b53343b313b0@googlegroups.com>
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:547406

Show key headers only | View raw


On 23/01/2016 4:13 PM, James McGinn wrote:
> Jonathan Thornburg [remove -animal to reply] 	
>
> 8:13 PM (46 minutes ago)
>
>
> This thread seems to have run its course.  The basic thermodynamics
> of water in its various phases is well-understood, and no substantive
> arguments to the contrary have emerged.  After discussion between the
> moderators, we have therefore unanamously agreed to close this thread.
>
> ciao,
>

They just don't want your cluttering up their newsgroup with nonsense. 
There are plenty of other places to spout, if you feel the need.

Sylvia.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:13 -0800
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 16:34 +1100
    Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-22 21:42 -0800
      Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-23 23:34 +1100
        Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2016-01-23 14:35 +0000
          Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- john <johnsefton288@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 07:49 -0800
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:00 -0600
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 08:43 -0800
        Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-01-23 10:47 -0500
          Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2016-01-28 17:13 +1100
            Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 08:04 -0800
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- Solving Tornadoes <solvingtornadoes@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 10:22 -0800
    Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood." -- Politics of Water Science -- Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 13:31 -0600
  Re: The Thought Police Have Declared Water "Well Understood."  -- Politics of Water Science -- James McGinn <jimmcginn9@gmail.com> - 2016-01-27 11:33 -0800

csiph-web