Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe
Date	Mon, 21 Dec 2015 05:45:48 +0100
Lines	25
Message-ID	<ddpeg3FfkplU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<56672006.3AA7@ix.netcom.com> <n47ktn$rhn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <fcJ9y.323437$4M.40423@fx17.iad> <n47n9e$vel$2@speranza.aioe.org> <AYGdnem6PrgmAvrLnZ2dnUU7-VsAAAAA@giganews.com> <n49lev$4ni$3@speranza.aioe.org> <WOWdnar325cqxPXLnZ2dnUU7-IUAAAAA@giganews.com> <n49m5h$8ba$1@speranza.aioe.org> <WOWdnaf325dUwfXLnZ2dnUU7-IUAAAAA@giganews.com> <n49mnk$8ba$2@speranza.aioe.org> <WOWdnaL325fz6fXLnZ2dnUU7-IWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <n49t8o$q8t$2@speranza.aioe.org> <WOWdndj325fr5_XLnZ2dnUU7-IUAAAAA@giganews.com> <5668B7A9.550B@ix.netcom.com> <i62dnSarZ4N9cPXLnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <5668F5C8.19CD@ix.netcom.com> <i62dnSKrZ4Mma_XLnZ2dnUU7-N-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <56691651.4C0F@ix.netcom.com> <605ec460-7d74-4e16-9c8b-2d302481e897@googlegroups.com> <566931FE.74D@ix.netcom.com> <5669D295.6F7B@ix.netcom.com> <566B4633.916@ix.netcom.com> <K6ydnaOGP5lBNfbLnZ2dnUU7-aGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <dd1uljFhjpkU1@mid.individual.net> <P9ydnXHhHdbDp_HLnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net 6D5rvYW9dzlxdDHu7WeUrQ4xESPnc91k1jH272aX35qBpuH2+0
Cancel-Lock	sha1:XxNiOVU8qMJf+leRN2yhxrtkAao=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
In-Reply-To	<P9ydnXHhHdbDp_HLnZ2dnUU7-SmdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Xref	csiph.com alt.astronomy:280074 sci.physics:540538 sci.physics.relativity:372472

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Am 12.12.2015 16:16, schrieb Sam Wormley:
>
>> The CMB is well explained as radiation left over from an early stage
>> in the development of the universe, and its discovery is considered a
>> landmark test of the Big Bang model of the universe. When the
>> universe was young, before the formation of stars and planets, it was
>> denser, much hotter, and filled with a uniform glow from a white-hot
>> fog of hydrogen plasma. As the universe expanded, both the plasma and
>> the radiation filling it grew cooler. When the universe cooled
>> enough, protons and electrons combined to form neutral atoms. These
>> atoms could no longer absorb the thermal radiation, and so the
>> universe became transparent instead of being an opaque fog.


Let's assume the 'big-bang' would have been a light-bulb, switched off 
13.8 billion years ago.

The remaining light cooled down to micro-waves and that is now received 
from all direction, since the universe expanded.

And this is actually, what they teach in schools and universities.



TH

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2015-12-21 05:45 +0100
  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2015-12-21 13:47 -0800
  Re: There Is No Edge To The Universe The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-12-22 14:03 -0800

csiph-web