Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #554948

Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Time to spin the kooks up again. Melt, kooks, melt. <snicker>

Ko0O0oki kensi the LunkHeaded LibTard, in
<news:na923r$e4u$1@gioia.aioe.org> did thusly jump head first into the
wood chipper again:

> On 19/02/2016 11:42 PM, Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler
> Emeritus wrote:

>> You stupid fuck. The period of each tributary sinewave is the inverse
>> of each tributary sinewave's frequency. The period of the resultant is
>> the inverse of the LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries.

> You stupid fuck. That would make the period of the resultant *shorter* 
> than the periods of the constituents, if there are constituents with 
> different frequencies.

You stupid fuck, no it wouldn't.

> For instance, a frequency of 2 Hz and a frequency of 3 Hz will have 
> periods of 1/2 and 1/3 second respectively. According to your ko0ky 
> math, the resultant has a period of 1/lcm(2,3) = 1/6 second, which is 
> obvious bullshit. (In fact the period of the resultant is 1/gcd, not 
> 1/lcm, and in this case that's 1.)

Moron can't do word problems. LOL

Did I say to take the LCM of the periods of the tributaries, or the
LCM of the frequencies of the tributaries, you moronic halfwit?

> Ah, my sides are hurting from laughing at your stupidity. Yet again
> you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue. So just because
> Ko0kHead says so, the period of the resultant is shorter than any of the 
> constituents' periods! Bwahahaha!

Ah, my sides are hurting from laughing at your stupidity. Yet again
you demonstrate that you have no fucking clue. You can't do simple
geometry problems, you've fucked up your stupid k'lame that you're an
astrophysicist because what astrophysicist wouldn't know that the
Riemann curvature tensor concept is the central mathematical tool in
the theory of general relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and
the curvature of space-time is described by the geodesic deviation
equation, or that space-time isn't primarily positive Gaussian
curvature because massive objects such as planets, stars and black
holes would ride *above* the tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski
space-time manifold, thereby making the planes of principal curvature
positive Gaussian curvature, and thus causing gravity to *repel*, and
now we find that you're *such* a moron you can't even do a simple word
math problem.

SPNAK!

Message-ID: <65d0f5e1ad03d42086b4a492e0eba763@dizum.com>
========================================================
========================================================
> <http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134389570800>  

Kensi was "vacationing"... in Pembroke, Ontario, Canada... quite by
coincidence, you understand... LunkHead was there with Nadegda,
apparently.

And Nadegda and Kensi most definitely were *not* there to double-team
on Paul Derbyshire's mushroom-slathered meatpole.

Paul Derbyshire is a life-long virgin, you see. He'll never touch
anything more feminine than his hand with a Barbie-doll wig glued to
it, paste-on eyes, and his mother's hooker-pink lipstick smeared
between thumb and index finger knuckle. Ironically, he's named his
f(e)isty lover "kensi". She's really hot in the sack... an expert in
getting anal. Sometimes, she takes it so deeply it pokes out of her
mouth!

Oh, here's Kensi:
<http://goo.gl/hdpXFC>

She's Paul Derbyshire's regular Saturday night thang. Ain't she purdy?
I'm sure a lot of guys have hit that. Chimpy's hit that... twice.

Strangely and quite coincidentally, Paul Derbyshire calls his right
thumb "Nadegda". I found a picture of Nadegda, too.

<https://goo.gl/sbdRcq>

You don't wanna know what she's into. *Really* kinky stuff. Suffice to
say sometimes she invites along her four sisters for what she calls
"sexy spelunking". You know what they say... fugly chicks gotta go
kinky. LOL

> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ>

> P.S. How's the astrophysics coming along? Have you visited 
> any good telescopes lately?

Ask kensi which observatories nearby have time standard control
capability. That's something every astronomer should know, right?

<snicker>
========================================================
========================================================

I note you've studiously avoided answering which observatories have
time standard control capability, LunkHead... only those who actually
work at an observatory would even know about such a thing, let alone
which observatories have that capability... but then, everyone knows
lumpy dumpy frumpy slumpy wannabes always out their womanly socks
because they're too stoooopid to play the part of the identity they've
assumed. Perhaps for your next sock, you should play the part of a mop
jockey or a streetwalker... that'd be something you could handle,
dude.

<snicker>

-- 

Kensi the moron wrote:
================================
The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2, and its area is 4*pi*r^2, so
the curvature is 4*pi
================================

Kensi the moron said the Gaussian curvature = 1 / r^2 *and* the
Gaussian curvature = 4 * pi.

Therefore, 1 / r^2 = 4 * pi
Therefore, r = 0.28209479176

Kensi the moron says every sphere in the entire universe has a radius
of 0.28209479176. Of course, being a moron, kensi didn't specify the
units.

The moron also said the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is dependent
upon that sphere's radius. Wholly incorrect.

Kensi the moron was corrected:
================================
Did... did you just say "the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2" *and* "the
Gaussian curvature = 4*pi" therefore "1/r^2 = 4*pi"? Now you
backpedal, LunkHead.

You mean the Gaussian curvature = 1/r^2 * (4*pi*r^2) therefore =
(4*pi), and therefore the Gaussian curvature of a sphere is
independent of r due to its symmetry, thereby proving your original
"The sphere's Gaussian curvature is 1/r^2" blather *wrong*?
================================

But Kensi the moron persists in insisting that what he wrote isn't
fucked up, and that the Gaussian curvature of a sphere *does* depend
upon its radius, because he doesn't understand the equations he's
trying to use, he doesn't know the difference between 'constant
curvature' and 'Gaussian curvature', he doesn't know what an integral
is, and he's a halfwit who can't figure out even basic geometry
problems.

Now remember, this is the same moron who k'lames he's an
astrophysicist... yet he's stated that the Riemann curvature tensor
concept being the central mathematical tool in the theory of general
relativity and the modern theory of gravity, and the curvature of
space-time being described by the geodesic deviation equation, is
"science fiction" and "a howler".

In addition, the moron k'lamed that 4-D Minkowski space-time was
mostly positive Gaussian curvature, with only small areas of negative
Gaussian curvature, which proves the moron has no idea of the effects
of mass or magnetism upon the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold.

He has k'lamed that the Gaussian curvature of the universe is
predominantly positive, which means Lunkhead believes that massive
objects such as planets, stars and black holes ride *above* the
tangential plane of the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, thereby
making the planes of principal curvature positive Gaussian curvature,
and thus causing gravity to *repel*.

Lunkhead the moron has k'lamed that magnetism has "*no* effect" upon
the 4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, then backpedaled and said there
was a "small amount of positive curvature due to the energy density in
the field", thereby proving he doesn't know how magnetism affects the
4-D Minkowski space-time manifold, and denies the existence of
magnetic attraction.

Thus, Kensi the moron has described a universe in which planets could
not maintain their orbits, a universe in which magnets could not work,
and therefore a universe which could not exist.

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow at a colder temperature
than the surrounding atmosphere is somehow violating the First and
Second Laws of Thermodynamics and giving off "blackbody radiation".

Kensi is the same moron who k'lames that snow gives off "blackbody
radiation" at wavelengths that would put the temperature of the snow
at 489 F.

Kensi is the same moron who first denied the existence of the
~11-micron infrared atmospheric window, then backpedaled and k'lamed
that snow emitted outside that ~11-micron window, and was proven
wrong. Then the spankard moron tried to use the backpedal of
"blackbody radiation" being at a different wavelength than spectral
emission, yet again demonstrating that the moron has no clue how
spectral absorption and emission works.

Kensi is the same moron who denies the NASA SABER study proving that
CO2 is a global *cooling* gas _because_ of the ~11-micron infrared
atmospheric window.

The reality exposed by the NASA SABER study also proves the Klimate
Katastrophe Kook Anthropogenic Global Warming k'lame of CO2 being a
global warming gas is a fairy tale that violates the First and Second
Laws of Thermodynamics, thus destroying CO2-induced AGW, yet this same
moron continues to cling to his delusions.

Kensi is the same moron who continues to cling to his delusion that
global warming causes more intense hurricanes, despite three
peer-reviewed studies proving the exact opposite.

Kensi is not an astrophysicist, he's far too stupid to be. He's just a
slumpy dumpy frumpy lumpy loser trying to pretend that he's
intelligent... and failing badly.

That would be because Kensi is a moron with an underpowered brain that
struggles (and fails) to understand reality.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-18 10:25 +0100
  Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 06:26 -0700
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 10:17 -0500
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 08:33 -0700
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 11:14 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-18 09:43 -0700
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-18 13:11 -0800
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 16:13 -0500
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-18 14:20 -0700
  Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:19 -0500
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 19:27 -0500
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 21:22 -0500
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-18 22:47 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-18 22:56 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 06:30 +0100
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 07:30 +0100
    Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 05:42 +0100
      Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:45 -0500
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 23:04 -0800
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 02:17 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-20 08:04 +0000
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-20 18:15 +0100
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:27 -0700
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 19:02 +0800
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 07:15 +0100
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-22 15:32 +0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-22 19:05 +0100
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 11:27 -0700
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 02:45 +0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:00 -0700
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-23 03:16 +0800
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 19:28 +0000
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-22 12:41 -0700
                Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-22 20:07 +0000
        Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "\"Fakey's\" dogwhistle holder living at 5907 Stanton Ave., Pittsburgh, PA (aka Teh Mop  Jockey), socked up as 5907 Stanton Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-2117" <root@127.0.0.1> - 2016-02-20 15:29 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 16:21 -0500
          Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 22:09 +0000
            Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:14 -0800
              Re: kensi is right and fakey is wrong Bite My Shiny Metal Ass <bender@the.future> - 2016-02-21 12:07 +0800

csiph-web