Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #589925
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news6 |
|---|---|
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? |
| Date | 19 Jul 2016 12:33:50 GMT |
| Organization | "Have EDDT, will travel" |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <PM000537FC44CDAC81@aca41cbd.ipt.aol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> <e4026570-6081-41c3-8f22-c086311d6e26@googlegroups.com> <dvirob9j7e1conoglgq136olds4guqhssf@4ax.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | p4b4599890b2310872556ce5c4d6a818120ddcedd8fa1e1af.newsdawg.com |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| User-Agent | Pineapple News/0.9.0 (Mac OS X 10.4.9 PowerPC) |
| X-Registered-To | [Registered Name] |
| X-Program-URL | http://www.platinumball.net/pineapple/news/macosx/ |
| X-Received-Bytes | 1543 |
| X-Received-Body-CRC | 902059261 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:589925 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Helmut Wabnig wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jul 2016 21:37:17 -0700 (PDT), mapou001@gmail.com wrote: > >>Why should a particle give a shit about a frame of reference? How does a particle know about its motion or position relative to other particles of FORs so as to give a rat's ass? >> >>If it does not exist, it's not physics. It's superstitious relativist crap. >> >>ahahahaha...AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... > > All particles in the universe know you are an idiot. Probably not his brane particle. /BAH
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 21:37 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-18 23:49 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:02 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-18 21:58 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-18 22:00 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-07-19 01:26 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 01:29 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 10:40 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@.- --- -.dotat> - 2016-07-19 08:43 +0200
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 00:03 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2016-07-19 12:33 +0000
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? xxein1@att.net - 2016-07-19 08:14 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 09:04 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:32 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 10:41 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-07-19 12:49 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 13:12 -0500
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? mapou001@gmail.com - 2016-07-19 11:19 -0700
Re: Two questions for brain-dead relativists: What is the physical composition of a frame of reference and why should the universe give a shit? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-07-20 01:49 -0400
csiph-web