Re: Viewing the spokes

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Viewing the spokes
Date	Sun, 18 Sep 2016 00:07:37 -0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	79
Sender	Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID	<9f21bd-a6d.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<nq1q63$bdd$1@gioia.aioe.org> <kp2nad-u39.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57db175c$0$31348$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <j7srad-4qo.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57db507c$0$31315$c3e8da3$dd9697d2@news.astraweb.com> <j08sad-t5q.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57dc5cfa$0$4527$c3e8da3$b280bf18@news.astraweb.com> <je5uad-5b3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57dc94e9$0$43888$c3e8da3$5e5e430d@news.astraweb.com> <dvjuad-kq4.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <57ddb490$0$62163$b1db1813$2411a48f@news.astraweb.com>
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="15077"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/YXwXXCZm6/+FFzvsQn+he"
User-Agent	tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock	sha1:7lekkK1Vb/zsvRJfLoajUXfZ4xQ=
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:597364

Show key headers only | View raw

benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
> On 9/16/2016 9:47 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>> On 9/16/2016 5:40 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>> On 9/16/2016 12:11 AM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>> benj <benj@nobody.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/15/2016 8:50 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Instantaneous only appears in mathematical equations, not in camera
>>>>>>>> exposures.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually not true,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> because there will be a LINE of point right along the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A line and a point are two different things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ground the camera sees that are not moving. Of course since the wheel is
>>>>>>> passing through the frame these exposures will be less than that set by
>>>>>>> the camera shutter, but film speed and exposure were not specified.
>>>>>>> Excuse me, nobody knows what film is any more, Lets just say the photo
>>>>>>> array automatically adjusts it's exposure, OK?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gibbering nonsense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There are no "these exposures", there is only one exposure during the
>>>>>> time the shutter is open.
>>>>>
>>>>> Drooling senile nonsense. When the image moves in the frame it is no
>>>>> longer exposing the sensor.
>>>>
>>>> Drooling senile nonsense.
>>>
>>> No imagination. Plagiarism.
>>>
>>>> The image is exposed the entire time the shutter is open, which means
>>>> the final image is the sum of whatever happed during the exposure time.
>>>
>>> Drooling nonsense. Set up your 4x5 press camera. Focus on a road. A car
>>> comes down the road. Stops in front of the camera for a minute. Then
>>> goes on. What is the exposure time of the car? Is it the whole time the
>>> shutter was open? You need to quite before you embarrass yourself further.
>>
>> The image is exposed the entire time the shutter is open, which means
>> the final image is the sum of whatever happened during the exposure time.
>>
>> Therefor the final image in your example will be primarily the background
>> mixed with the streak of the moving car on either side of what will be
>> primarily the car mixed with the background.
>>
>> You lost this silly argument long ago due to your utter lack of understanding
>> the basics of imaging.
>>
>> <snip remaining silly name calling, dick waving, and drool>
> 
> Please explain the difference between the image of moving objects taken 
> with a blade shutter and the same situation taken with a focal plane 
> shutter. Not the same are they? I think everybody gets your message that 
> you are very very smart and everyone else is very very stooopid.
 
I've never heard of a "blade shutter" and even looked up shutters to
see if it was something I had missed; it was not.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shutter_(photography)

FYI all mechanical shutters have blades of one sort or another.

I think everybody gets your message that you are making shit up as
you go along.



-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Viewing the spokes Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-29 12:08 -0500
  Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-29 18:00 +0000
    Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-29 21:00 -0400
      Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 01:14 +0000
        Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-29 22:45 -0400
          Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 04:14 +0000
            Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 21:59 -0700
              Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 05:16 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 23:00 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 18:29 -0700
  Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 18:29 -0700
  Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 18:46 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-30 19:40 -0400
      Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-30 22:07 -0700
        Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-30 23:48 -0700
          Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-31 09:54 -0700
            Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-02 10:00 -0700
              Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 13:23 -0700
              Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 11:30 -0700
                Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 13:18 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 14:57 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:01 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-04 12:46 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green Ergios <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-07 12:32 -0500
                Re: Red, Blue and Green noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 12:12 -0700
                Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-07 23:22 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:03 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:06 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 00:18 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 12:52 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-07 10:01 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 10:12 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 09:47 -0700
        Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 14:32 -0700
  Re: Viewing the spokes "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 11:39 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-04 20:36 -0700
  Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 09:08 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 12:32 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 17:51 -0400
      Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 00:10 +0000
        Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 20:43 -0400
          Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 00:57 +0000
            Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 21:07 -0400
              Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 01:33 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 20:59 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 02:41 +0000
      Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 19:43 -0700
        Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 21:29 -0400
          Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 02:43 +0000
          Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 13:28 -0700
          Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 17:14 -0700
            Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 21:52 -0400
              Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-14 05:11 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 17:49 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 00:50 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:52 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 04:11 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 16:58 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:40 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 20:56 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 01:47 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:24 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-18 00:07 +0000
              Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 14:26 -0700
                Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 15:04 -0700
                Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 12:54 -0700
              Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:47 -0700
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:24 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-15 05:12 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 15:45 -0700
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:36 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 02:58 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 12:15 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-09-15 09:15 -0400
      Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 15:48 -0700
        Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 15:33 -0700

csiph-web