Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #595732

Re: Red, Blue and Green

Message-ID <57CB5644.3B92@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date 2016-09-03 16:01 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.atheism
Subject Re: Red, Blue and Green
References (6 earlier) <57C9B010.1199@ix.netcom.com> <57CB16D6.5166@ix.netcom.com> <57CB3027.4A81@ix.netcom.com> <57CB4762.5CE7@ix.netcom.com> <cbe453a8-2eb3-4c14-a67a-67c523883852@googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Marvin Sebourn wrote:
> 
> On Saturday, September 3, 2016 at 4:56:47 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote:
> > You can imagine all the problems one encounters
> > when trying to paint walls, pictures, etc using
> > the primary colors red, green, blue and getting White all the time!
> >
> > So...a second Primary Color had to be ...invented,
> >
> > Red, Blue and Yellow.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The Starmaker wrote:
> > >
> > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > benj wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 8/29/2016 9:46 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > i have a question for you...
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > why are there two primary colors on earth?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > That is so everything in your life can look like shit.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I presume you are too young to have ever seen what the old two color
> > > > > > > > > technicolor movies used to look like.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The Two Primary Colors are:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 1) Blue, Red, Green
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2) Blue, Red, Yellow
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > why are there Two primary colors on earth?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I might have to define the word Primary because it's a pattern with yous people not
> > > > > > > knowing or understanding the english language....especially in the united states scientific community.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1.
> > > > > > > first or highest in rank or importance; chief; principal:
> > > > > > > (his primary goals in life.)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Not, his primaries goals in like, "primary"...meaning One.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  2.
> > > > > > > first in order in any series, sequence, etc.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  5.
> > > > > > > constituting or belonging to the first stage in any process.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, if you look at the definition of the words:
> > > > > > > http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary-color
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  1.
> > > > > > > Art. a color, as red, yellow, or blue, that in mixture yields other colors.
> > > > > > > Compare complementary color (def 1), secondary color, tertiary color.
> > > > > > > 2.
> > > > > > > Optics. any of a set of monochromatic colors, as red, green, and blue, that are added to match or specify the chromaticity of a stimulus or sample.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There above are Two primary colors
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1.red, yellow, and blue
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2.red, green, and blue
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Both by definition are:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 1) primary-colors
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 2) They are both "first"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3)They are both "the first stage", first in order in any series...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > There are both First primary colors.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > My question is...why are there two "primary" colors on earth?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Now, if you have a problem with the word "Why", I can change it to
> > > > > > "How".
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How are there two "primary" colors on earth?
> > > > >
> > > > > Of course...I'm the only one on earth that can answer this physics question correctly..
> > > > >
> > > > > It's a mistake!
> > > > >
> > > > > When the primarys colors red, blue and green first came into being, ...and around
> > > > > 4.5 billion years later the earth was formed..making the primary colors
> > > > > red, blue and green for pigments didn't work! So, it had to be changed/added
> > > > >  (a new set of primary colors) from Green to Yellow.
> > > > >
> > > > > And that fixed the mistake.
> > > > >
> > > > > Whether the mistake was created by Nature error, or a computer error..regardless...it was corrected.
> > > >
> > > > Now, can you imagine what it would be like if there was only one set of primary colors, red, blue and green in the entire universe?
> > >
> > > If you try and paint a picture, using Red, Blue and Green (which mixed will be White) and you add Red to make pink...you'll get White instead!
> > >
> > > If you buy a jar of White paint, (Red, Blue and Green mixed) and you add Blue...you get White.
> >
> >
> >
> > You can imagine all the problems one encounters
> > when trying to paint walls, pictures, etc using
> > the primary colors red, green, blue and getting White all the time!
> >
> > So...a second Primary Color had to be ...invented,
> >
> > Red, Blue and Yellow.
> 
> Two color Technicolor is interesting, with three-color Technicolor being about eighty years old.
> 
> But your idea of mixing the pigment paints red, green, and blue (such as in watercolors, oils, etc) and obtaining white is nonsense.

Yes, it is nonsense..but I didn't say that..

I wrote above: http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary-color

Red, Blue and Green are the primary colors of light. Which when mixed together equals White.

I also wrote above:


> > So...a second Primary Color had to be ...invented,
> >
> > Red, Blue and Yellow.


My point was...imagine if there was only one primary colors, Red, Blue and Green?


But as you see, there are two sets of primary colors

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/primary-color

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Viewing the spokes Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-08-29 12:08 -0500
  Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-29 18:00 +0000
    Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-29 21:00 -0400
      Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 01:14 +0000
        Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-29 22:45 -0400
          Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 04:14 +0000
            Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 21:59 -0700
              Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-08-30 05:16 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 23:00 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-29 18:29 -0700
  Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 18:29 -0700
  Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-29 18:46 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-08-30 19:40 -0400
      Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-30 22:07 -0700
        Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-30 23:48 -0700
          Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-08-31 09:54 -0700
            Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-02 10:00 -0700
              Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-02 13:23 -0700
              Re: Viewing the spokes The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 11:30 -0700
                Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 13:18 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 14:57 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:01 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-04 12:46 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green Ergios <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-09-07 12:32 -0500
                Re: Red, Blue and Green noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-08 12:12 -0700
                Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-07 23:22 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:03 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-03 16:06 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 00:18 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-20 12:52 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-07 10:01 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green Gutless Umbrella Carrying Sissy <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2016-09-07 10:12 -0700
                Re: Red, Blue and Green The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-09-20 09:47 -0700
        Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-08-31 14:32 -0700
  Re: Viewing the spokes "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2016-09-04 11:39 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-09-04 20:36 -0700
  Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 09:08 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 12:32 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 17:51 -0400
      Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 00:10 +0000
        Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 20:43 -0400
          Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 00:57 +0000
            Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-09 21:07 -0400
              Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-10 01:33 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 20:59 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 02:41 +0000
      Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-09 19:43 -0700
        Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-12 21:29 -0400
          Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-13 02:43 +0000
          Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 13:28 -0700
          Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-13 17:14 -0700
            Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-13 21:52 -0400
              Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-14 05:11 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 17:49 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 00:50 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:52 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 04:11 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 16:58 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 21:40 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-16 20:56 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-17 01:47 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-17 17:24 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-18 00:07 +0000
              Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 14:26 -0700
                Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 15:04 -0700
                Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-16 12:54 -0700
              Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 19:47 -0700
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2016-09-14 23:24 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-15 05:12 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 15:45 -0700
                Re: Viewing the spokes benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2016-09-15 21:36 -0400
                Re: Viewing the spokes jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2016-09-16 02:58 +0000
                Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 12:15 -0700
    Re: Viewing the spokes Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-09-15 09:15 -0400
      Re: Viewing the spokes "nuny@bid.nes" <Alien8752@gmail.com> - 2016-09-15 15:48 -0700
        Re: Viewing the spokes noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-09-18 15:33 -0700

csiph-web