Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com
Newsgroups	sci.physics
Subject	Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought?
Date	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 03:32:57 -0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	10
Sender	Jim Pennino <jimp@mail.specsol.com>
Message-ID	<98dscc-hl3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink)
References	<_7WdnSbU8PgG9GbInZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com>
Injection-Info	mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="db4120ef82bbc153014637d4cd15a795"; logging-data="25708"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+fllMsI/gzL0azqv0Li7df"
User-Agent	tin/2.2.1-20140504 ("Tober an Righ") (UNIX) (SunOS/5.10 (i86pc))
Cancel-Lock	sha1:/qgy1PV268OAno9n/lCKM9LHTx4=
Xref	csiph.com sci.physics:521772

Show key headers only | View raw

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought?

No, spamming shit head, because in the real world if you are going
to the trouble of building one you measure the effectiveness, you
worthless, cut and paste, spamming piece of shit.


-- 
Jim Pennino

Thread

Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 20:32 -0500
  Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 03:32 +0000
    Re: For the jimp: http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:28 -0500
      Re: shit head displays his ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:48 +0000
  Why Faraday cages are less effective than stooopid people previously thought? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 01:02 -0400
  Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-18 13:21 -0700

csiph-web