Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521825
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: shit head displays his ignorance |
| Date | 2015-09-18 17:48 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1dvtcc-2o8.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <_7WdnSbU8PgG9GbInZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <98dscc-hl3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <_7WdnVnU8PgdjGHInZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > On 9/17/15 10:32 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: >> No, spamming shit head, because in the real world if you are going >> to the trouble of building one you measure the effectiveness, you >> worthless, cut and paste, spamming piece of shit. > > > > For the jimp: For the ass hat piece of shit spammer: It seems that the spamming shit head is too ignorant of the real world to comment on my response. Such is to be expected from an ignorant, spamming, cut and paste shit head. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 20:32 -0500
Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 03:32 +0000
Re: For the jimp: http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:28 -0500
Re: shit head displays his ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:48 +0000
Why Faraday cages are less effective than stooopid people previously thought? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 01:02 -0400
Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-18 13:21 -0700
csiph-web