Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #521772
| From | jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| Subject | Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? |
| Date | 2015-09-18 03:32 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <98dscc-hl3.ln1@mail.specsol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <_7WdnSbU8PgG9GbInZ2dnUU7-QOdnZ2d@giganews.com> |
Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? No, spamming shit head, because in the real world if you are going to the trouble of building one you measure the effectiveness, you worthless, cut and paste, spamming piece of shit. -- Jim Pennino
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-17 20:32 -0500
Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 03:32 +0000
Re: For the jimp: http://www.yellowpages.com/rancho-cucamonga-ca/anger-management-classes Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 08:28 -0500
Re: shit head displays his ignorance jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-09-18 17:48 +0000
Why Faraday cages are less effective than stooopid people previously thought? benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-09-18 01:02 -0400
Re: Hey -- Are Faraday cages less effective than previously thought? Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-09-18 13:21 -0700
csiph-web