Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #693227
| Path | csiph.com!xmission!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 08 Jul 2018 19:57:31 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5B42B2F1.6C4@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Sun, 08 Jul 2018 17:57:21 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? |
| References | <5B40F5A3.3CD@ix.netcom.com> <b36d5143-284e-4315-9190-55d748953f75@googlegroups.com> <5B4102D4.46B4@ix.netcom.com> <43ca2bcd-291d-4115-95d6-12ebfbba2985@googlegroups.com> <5B416079.3A07@ix.netcom.com> <f91b5ab8-4d0e-442e-a84a-9231103bf827@googlegroups.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 180708-6, 07/08/2018), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Lines | 97 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-PbThG4MloNC9AZQu1yqxteCtSizEFTlXM2Zdm0nc2tci5199N0CECv/+nW6rAmiSDgxftEW/o58hxuM!hI44F9Ksb5/4oW7Yux2SY0+Ov9hhakyjQBiR/fjotu+DKnBsg5QcdG/+8NcPydYpb/bePEkF9fvx!6YKy/mu8KA== |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 4177 |
| Xref | csiph.com rec.arts.sf.written:494638 sci.physics:693227 sci.physics.relativity:463849 alt.astronomy:300126 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Mark Earnest wrote: > > On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 7:53:13 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > Mark Earnest wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 1:13:48 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Mark Earnest wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 12:17:32 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > > > Is the moon there when nobody looks? > > > > > > > > > > > > Actually, even if you're looking at it, it's not there...at least not all there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It's all there as time has passed, but it's not all there while time is passing. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You cannot travel into the future because there is no future to travel too.. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not all there..yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > One minute of 'absolute time' is not all there either. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you were to jump one second forward of 'absolute time'..it would be blank, > > > > > > > > > > > > or you would hit a blank wall. > > > > > > > > > > > > You can probably see a half of moon.. > > > > > > > > > > > > but the other half..hasn't happen yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When is the future? > > > > > > > > > > > > The future is Now. > > > > > > > > > > That is all very nice but it is too vague for me. Crystalize your conceptions > > > > > > > > > > maybe. Time is a phenomenon. I agree with that part of it. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd be happy to explain.. > > > > > > > > if you're watching a 16mm film > > > > and it breaks in the middle.. > > > > > > > > you only got to see half the movie. > > > > > > > > Closer examination of the broken film > > > > contains a split frame of film.. > > > > > > > > you see only half the frame. > > > > > > > > Or, if you were at the film lab > > > > when the film was processed.. > > > > only part of the film has developed.. > > > > you will need to wait for the rest of > > > > the film to be developed. > > > > > > > > OR!, if you filming the film.. > > > > the frames are being exposed > > > > frame be frame... > > > > > > > > You watching > > > > as the > > > > world > > > > developes. > > > > > > So whatever happens is already there even before it even happens. > > > > > > > > No, that is not what I said... > > > > I said one second ahead is unexposed film. > > Then I give up trying to understand you. You mustn't confine yourself to the english language...you need pictures. You take a poloroid camera and take a picture.. it takes a few minutes for the print to develop right before your very eyes. If you jump into the future it's all blank.. and you have to wait a few minutes to see...the universe and everything in it.
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 10:17 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 11:13 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 11:45 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 17:53 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-08 17:57 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 16:35 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? mitchrae3323@gmail.com - 2018-07-08 18:21 -0700
Re:Is the moon there when nobody looks? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-07-08 06:29 +0200
Re:Is the moon there when nobody looks? Ninapenda Jibini <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 04:32 +0000
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? Boris Mohar <borism_void_@sympatico.ca> - 2018-07-08 04:53 -0400
csiph-web