Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.arts.sf.written > #494573
| Message-ID | <5B416079.3A07@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Date | 2018-07-07 17:53 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | rec.arts.sf.written, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? |
| References | <5B40F5A3.3CD@ix.netcom.com> <b36d5143-284e-4315-9190-55d748953f75@googlegroups.com> <5B4102D4.46B4@ix.netcom.com> <43ca2bcd-291d-4115-95d6-12ebfbba2985@googlegroups.com> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Mark Earnest wrote: > > On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 1:13:48 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > Mark Earnest wrote: > > > > > > On Saturday, July 7, 2018 at 12:17:32 PM UTC-5, The Starmaker wrote: > > > > Is the moon there when nobody looks? > > > > > > > > Actually, even if you're looking at it, it's not there...at least not all there. > > > > > > > > > > > > It's all there as time has passed, but it's not all there while time is passing. > > > > > > > > > > > > You cannot travel into the future because there is no future to travel too.. > > > > > > > > > > > > it's not all there..yet. > > > > > > > > One minute of 'absolute time' is not all there either. > > > > > > > > If you were to jump one second forward of 'absolute time'..it would be blank, > > > > > > > > or you would hit a blank wall. > > > > > > > > You can probably see a half of moon.. > > > > > > > > but the other half..hasn't happen yet. > > > > > > > > > > > > When is the future? > > > > > > > > The future is Now. > > > > > > That is all very nice but it is too vague for me. Crystalize your conceptions > > > > > > maybe. Time is a phenomenon. I agree with that part of it. > > > > > > I'd be happy to explain.. > > > > if you're watching a 16mm film > > and it breaks in the middle.. > > > > you only got to see half the movie. > > > > Closer examination of the broken film > > contains a split frame of film.. > > > > you see only half the frame. > > > > Or, if you were at the film lab > > when the film was processed.. > > only part of the film has developed.. > > you will need to wait for the rest of > > the film to be developed. > > > > OR!, if you filming the film.. > > the frames are being exposed > > frame be frame... > > > > You watching > > as the > > world > > developes. > > So whatever happens is already there even before it even happens. No, that is not what I said... I said one second ahead is unexposed film.
Back to rec.arts.sf.written | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 10:17 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 11:13 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 11:45 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 17:53 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-08 17:57 -0700
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-07-07 16:35 -0700
Re:Is the moon there when nobody looks? Libor Striz <poutnik4REMOVEnntp@CAPITALSgmail.com> - 2018-07-08 06:29 +0200
Re:Is the moon there when nobody looks? Ninapenda Jibini <taustinca@gmail.com> - 2018-07-08 04:32 +0000
Re: Is the moon there when nobody looks? "artyw2@yahoo.com" <artyw2@yahoo.com> - 2018-07-09 17:17 -0700
csiph-web