Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #681579

Re: irreproducibility crisis

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!peer03.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date Wed, 18 Apr 2018 12:31:49 -0500
Message-ID <5AD78102.4F6D@ix.netcom.com> (permalink)
Date Wed, 18 Apr 2018 10:31:46 -0700
From The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com>
Reply-To starmaker@ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version 1.0
Newsgroups sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.astronomy
Subject Re: irreproducibility crisis
References <5AD62852.4706@ix.netcom.com> <fjp3lgFkspvU2@mid.individual.net>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Antivirus Avast (VPS 180418-4, 04/18/2018), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Lines 16
X-Usenet-Provider http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 108.219.229.47
X-Trace sv3-ZObCUpaxy661G3i974hFy52DM6nrliewx2TnkAVNcIAvup8yNZGy6wGU2IKBq6aA664Fq4JD2UXAMpZ!t6B2GK8iM28rjDLKgqgS6ejLP2DvV1muWIxx785oMgSm0zNGAT8FmK2hP/XNKEAeEyU+9/IaJd4r!lL8ErvwHYQ8=
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly
X-Postfilter 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes 1562
X-Received-Bytes 1684
X-Received-Body-CRC 2839463280
Xref csiph.com sci.physics:681579 sci.physics.relativity:456330 alt.astronomy:298161

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


Thomas Heger wrote:
> 
> Am 17.04.2018 um 19:01 schrieb The Starmaker:
> > "Half the results published in peer-reviewed scientific journals are probably wrong.
> 
> The problem is: they don't know which half....
> 
> TH



you have to write it in a way...that the person reading it doesn't
understand it.


All you have to do is throw in a lot of numbers and the reader...

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 10:01 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-17 10:50 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-17 11:03 -0700
    Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-18 08:26 -0700
  Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-18 16:39 +0200
    Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-18 10:31 -0700
      Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-19 18:46 +0200
        Re: irreproducibility crisis Edward Prochak <edprochak@gmail.com> - 2018-04-19 14:14 -0700
        Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-19 23:45 -0700
          Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-20 17:54 +0200
            Re: irreproducibility crisis Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-04-24 10:33 -0500
            Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-24 09:01 -0700
              Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-24 18:39 +0200
                Re: irreproducibility crisis The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2018-04-24 09:50 -0700
                Re: irreproducibility crisis Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2018-04-25 14:26 +0200

csiph-web