Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #636745

Re: our twin star

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

The Starmaker wrote:
> 
> Hägar wrote:
> >
> > "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5942B53B.3CF0@ix.netcom.com...
> >
> > Hägar wrote:
> > >
> > > "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com...
> > >
> > > a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with
> > > companions
> > > https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html
> > > https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis
> > >
> > > Now, let me explain it all for yous...
> > >
> > > You can look at the big dipper or little dipper
> > > and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died.
> > >
> > > Twin stars have a pipeline that transfer energy to each other. If
> > > the star drifts away...the pipeline is broken, and the star begins to die.
> > >
> > > Twin stars are one positive and one negative.
> > >
> > > Now, what hasn't been discovered yet (i'm waiting for a thousand years for
> > > you
> > > people to catch up with my genuies)
> > >
> > > what hasn't been discovered yet ...is
> > >
> > > every single person is a twin molded into one person.
> > >
> > > That means, stars not also drift away, but they also meld into one.
> > >
> > > So, those stupid people looking for our twin star ...some where else...
> > > need to look a little closer at our sun and they will find the twin.
> > >
> > > (i give them another thousand years to find that out)
> > >
> > > The Starmaker
> > >
> > > ***boy oh boy ... you're right up there with treBert, that other
> > > manufacturer of putrid brain farts.  You two even misspell words
> > > the same way ... are you by any chance hanging onto delusions
> > > of a Nobel Prize, like your bro treBert???
> >
> > Is there something you disagree with you need to point it out otherwise you
> > have not a leg to stand on.
> >
> > (but i don't subscribe to drive by shootings as yourself)
> >
> > *** Well, here's some more fuel for the fires of your vivid imagination:
> > http://nypost.com/2017/06/14/our-sun-might-have-had-an-evil-twin-that-killed-the-dinosaurs/amp/
> 
> the more crackpots the 'scientific communtiy' producers, the more killed-the-dinosaurs  different scenerios it puts out.
> 
> The truth is nothing killed the dinosaurs....they just died.


its not like they had online dating services in those days or night
clubs a dinosaur can go too to pick up
chicks and make babies with...it probably was  hard to grab an elephant
or a BIRD to make babies with...

there simply were no girls around.

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
  Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
    Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
      Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
          Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
            Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
              Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
      Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
          Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
            Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:19 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
          Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 14:14 -0700
            Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:30 -0700
            Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:43 -0700
              Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:24 -0400
                Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 18:20 -0700
                Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 22:38 -0400
                Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-16 16:18 -0700
                Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 20:24 -0700
              Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:04 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
            Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
    Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
      Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
  Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:42 -0700
    Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:22 -0400
    Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:19 -0700

csiph-web