Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #636539

Re: our twin star

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
> 
> Hägar wrote:
> 
> > "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com...
> >
> > a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with
> > companions
> > https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html
> > https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis
> >
> >
> > Now, let me explain it all for yous...
> >
> > You can look at the big dipper or little dipper
> > and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died. […]
> 
> There are two possibilities for this utter misinterpretion of what you have
> just referred to:
> 
> A) You are delusional because you have not taken your pills.
> 
>    In that case, please take your pills.
> 
> B) You have taken some pills, and are now delusional.
> 
>    In that case, please do not take those pills again.
> 
> In any case, please seek professional help, and unplug.  TIA.
> 
> --
> PointedEars
> 
> Twitter: @PointedEars2
> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.


Is there something you disagree with, .. you need to point it out,
otherwise you also have not a pointed ear to.. stand on.


(and i don't subscribe to drive by shootings or self-appointed doctors offering medical advise and perscriptions)


> >>
> >> "The Starmaker"  wrote in message news:5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com...
> >>
> >> a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with
> >> companions
> >> https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html
> >> https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis
> >>
> >> Now, let me explain it all for yous...
> >>
> >> You can look at the big dipper or little dipper
> >> and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died.
> >>
> >> Twin stars have a pipeline that transfer energy to each other. If
> >> the star drifts away...the pipeline is broken, and the star begins to
> >> die.
> >>
> >> Twin stars are one positive and one negative.
> >>
> >> Now, what hasn't been discovered yet (i'm waiting for a thousand years
> >> for you
> >> people to catch up with my genuies)
> >>
> >> what hasn't been discovered yet ...is
> >>
> >> every single person is a twin molded into one person.
> >>
> >> That means, stars not also drift away, but they also meld into one.
> >>
> >> So, those stupid people looking for our twin star ...some where else...
> >> need to look a little closer at our sun and they will find the twin.
> >>
> >> (i give them another thousand years to find that out)
> >>
> >> The Starmaker

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
  Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
    Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
      Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
          Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
            Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
              Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
      Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
          Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
            Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:19 -0700
        Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
          Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 14:14 -0700
            Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:30 -0700
            Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:43 -0700
              Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:24 -0400
                Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 18:20 -0700
                Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 22:38 -0400
                Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-16 16:18 -0700
                Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 20:24 -0700
              Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:04 -0700
          Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
            Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
    Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
      Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
        Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
  Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:42 -0700
    Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:22 -0400
    Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:19 -0700

csiph-web