Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #636513
| Path | csiph.com!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Thu, 15 Jun 2017 11:26:40 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <5942B53B.3CF0@ix.netcom.com> (permalink) |
| Date | Thu, 15 Jun 2017 09:26:35 -0700 |
| From | The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> |
| Reply-To | starmaker@ix.netcom.com |
| X-Mailer | Mozilla 3.04Gold (WinNT; U) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, rec.arts.sf.written, alt.astronomy |
| Subject | Re: our twin star |
| References | <5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com> <deWdnfTX4utHL9_EnZ2dnUU7-VfNnZ2d@giganews.com> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Antivirus | Avast (VPS 170615-0, 06/15/2017), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Lines | 47 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 108.219.229.47 |
| X-Trace | sv3-TmILYm1peO1cbQjVZb3WaOtpV26HHk9eiyDTBtM8kub0M/e1R2Moe5qKuy7AQ0jrESCQo+M9swMxYBm!mT/+IDhrWrmU0facI6vPdeVfjZrhHYAIi15V2rrQP7DwA+mORX2lKHOyIAt5w3ye0kSG0RbHOHXM!0NUPhFaHPwU= |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2871 |
| Xref | csiph.com sci.physics:636513 sci.physics.relativity:422644 rec.arts.sf.written:473354 alt.astronomy:291497 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Hägar wrote: > > "The Starmaker" wrote in message news:5942AFF8.3999@ix.netcom.com... > > a new study reports that almost all sun-like stars are likely born with > companions > https://www.space.com/37186-sun-long-lost-twin-nemesis.html > https://www.sciencealert.com/all-stars-might-be-born-with-a-twin-and-we-ve-called-ours-nemesis > > Now, let me explain it all for yous... > > You can look at the big dipper or little dipper > and see the twin stars...and one of the twins...died. > > Twin stars have a pipeline that transfer energy to each other. If > the star drifts away...the pipeline is broken, and the star begins to die. > > Twin stars are one positive and one negative. > > Now, what hasn't been discovered yet (i'm waiting for a thousand years for > you > people to catch up with my genuies) > > what hasn't been discovered yet ...is > > every single person is a twin molded into one person. > > That means, stars not also drift away, but they also meld into one. > > So, those stupid people looking for our twin star ...some where else... > need to look a little closer at our sun and they will find the twin. > > (i give them another thousand years to find that out) > > The Starmaker > > ***boy oh boy ... you're right up there with treBert, that other > manufacturer of putrid brain farts. You two even misspell words > the same way ... are you by any chance hanging onto delusions > of a Nobel Prize, like your bro treBert??? Is there something you disagree with you need to point it out otherwise you have not a leg to stand on. (but i don't subscribe to drive by shootings as yourself)
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:04 -0700
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:16 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 09:26 -0700
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-15 09:31 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 14:38 +0200
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 11:51 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-17 22:34 +0200
Re: our twin star Hägar <hsahm@yahoo.com> - 2017-06-17 17:46 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:20 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-17 10:30 -0700
Re: our twin star "Bast" <fakename@nomail.invalid> - 2017-06-15 14:57 -0400
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:15 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:19 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 13:40 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 14:14 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 14:30 -0700
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:43 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:24 -0400
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 18:20 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 22:38 -0400
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-16 16:18 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 20:24 -0700
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:04 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 10:45 -0700
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-16 11:07 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 20:38 +0200
Re: our twin star The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2017-06-15 12:27 -0700
Re: our twin star Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2017-06-15 22:44 +0200
Re: our twin star "reber G=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2017-06-15 15:42 -0700
Re: our twin star benj <benj@nobody.net> - 2017-06-15 19:22 -0400
Re: our twin star "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2017-06-15 17:19 -0700
csiph-web